Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Radiology. 2017 Jun;283(3):845-853. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2017162187. Epub 2017 Feb 4.

External Factors That Influence the Practice of Radiology: Proceedings of the International Society for Strategic Studies in Radiology Meeting.

Author information

1
From the Department of Radiology, Duke University, 2424 Erwin Rd, Suite 301, Duke Mail Box 2702, Durham, NC 27705 (G.D.R.); Department of Health Care Policy, Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass (B.J.M.); Department of Radiology, Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem, Szeged, Hungary (A.P.); Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Mass (J.H.T.); Department of Radiology, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (G.P.K.); Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY (A.M.); and Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Mass (H.Y.K.).

Abstract

In both the United States and Europe, efforts to reduce soaring health care costs have led to intense scrutiny of both standard and innovative uses of imaging. Given that the United States spends a larger share of its gross domestic product on health care than any other nation and also has the most varied health care financing and delivery systems in the world, it has become an especially fertile environment for developing and testing approaches to controlling health care costs and value. This report focuses on recent reforms that have had a dampening effect on imaging use in the United States and provides a glimpse of obstacles that imaging practices may soon face or are already facing in other countries. On the basis of material presented at the 2015 meeting of the International Society for Strategic Studies in Radiology, this report outlines the effects of reforms aimed at (a) controlling imaging use, (b) controlling payer expense through changes in benefit design, and (c) controlling both costs and quality through "value-based" payment schemes. Reasons are considered for radiology practices on both sides of the Atlantic about why the emphasis needs to shift from providing a large volume of imaging services to increasing the value of imaging as manifested in clinical outcomes, patient satisfaction, and overall system savings. Options for facilitating the shift from volume to value are discussed, from the use of advanced management strategies that improve workflow to the creation of programs for patient engagement, the development of new clinical decision-making support tools, and the validation of clinically relevant imaging biomarkers. Radiologists in collaboration with industry must enhance their efforts to expand the performance of comparative effectiveness research to establish the value of these initiatives, while being mindful of the importance of minimizing conflicts of interest. © RSNA, 2017.

PMID:
28157409
DOI:
10.1148/radiol.2017162187
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center