Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Sci Rep. 2017 Feb 1;7:41614. doi: 10.1038/srep41614.

Overcoming the dichotomy between open and isolated populations using genomic data from a large European dataset.

Author information

1
Dipartimento di Biologia Ambientale, Sapienza Università di Roma, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome, 00185, Italy.
2
Istituto Italiano di Antropologia, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, Rome, 00185, Italy.
3
Estonian Biocentre, Riia 23b, 51010, Tartu, Estonia.
4
Dipartimento di Scienze Biologiche, Geologiche ed Ambientali, Università di Bologna, Via Selmi 3, Bologna, 40126, Italy.
5
Department of Anthropology, University of Pennsylvania, 3260 South St, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
6
National Geographic Society, 1145 17th Street NW, Washington DC 20036, United States of America.
7
Department of Integrative Biology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
8
Dipartimento di Scienze della Natura del Territorio, Università di Sassari, Via Piandanna 4, Sassari, 07100, Italy.
9
Institute of Genetics and Biophysics "A. Buzzati-Traverso", National Research Council (CNR), Via Pietro Castellino, 111, Naples,80131, Italy.
10
Dipartimento di Scienze della Vita e dell'Ambiente, Università di Cagliari, SS 554, km 4.500, Monserrato, Cagliari,09042, Italy.
11
Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Pisa, Via Ghini 13, Pisa, 56126, Italy.

Abstract

Human populations are often dichotomized into "isolated" and "open" categories using cultural and/or geographical barriers to gene flow as differential criteria. Although widespread, the use of these alternative categories could obscure further heterogeneity due to inter-population differences in effective size, growth rate, and timing or amount of gene flow. We compared intra and inter-population variation measures combining novel and literature data relative to 87,818 autosomal SNPs in 14 open populations and 10 geographic and/or linguistic European isolates. Patterns of intra-population diversity were found to vary considerably more among isolates, probably due to differential levels of drift and inbreeding. The relatively large effective size estimated for some population isolates challenges the generalized view that they originate from small founding groups. Principal component scores based on measures of intra-population variation of isolated and open populations were found to be distributed along a continuum, with an area of intersection between the two groups. Patterns of inter-population diversity were even closer, as we were able to detect some differences between population groups only for a few multidimensional scaling dimensions. Therefore, different lines of evidence suggest that dichotomizing human populations into open and isolated groups fails to capture the actual relations among their genomic features.

PMID:
28145502
PMCID:
PMC5286425
DOI:
10.1038/srep41614
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center