Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Mar - Apr;5(2):391-397.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2016.12.016. Epub 2017 Jan 20.

Food-Allergic Adolescents at Risk for Anaphylaxis: A Randomized Controlled Study of Supervised Injection to Improve Comfort with Epinephrine Self-Injection.

Author information

1
Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY. Electronic address: eyal.shemesh@mssm.edu.
2
Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
3
Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY; Department of Psychology, Fordham University, Bronx, NY.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Epinephrine self-injection is a key element in the management of food allergy, yet many adolescents report that they may not be able to use the autoinjector when needed. We hypothesized that supervised self-injection with an empty syringe would increase adolescents' comfort with self-injection.

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of this study was to examine the effect of supervised self-injection on self- and parent-reported comfort and anxiety during and after clinic visits in a food allergy center.

METHODS:

Sixty adolescent/parent pairs were randomized to self-injection versus control (education only). The predefined primary outcome was a self-reported comfort level with the injection before versus after the intervention on a Likert scale with scores of 1 (Not at all comfortable) to 10 (Extremely comfortable). The primary outcome was evaluated via within-group and between-group analyses. Secondary outcomes included adolescent and parent reports before versus after the injection, and changes in quality of life (QoL) and anxiety a month later.

RESULTS:

Self-injection was associated with a significant immediate increase in comfort levels (primary outcome; within-group comparison: mean scores: 6.93 preintervention vs 8.37 postintervention, P < .01; between-group ANOVA: 8.37 vs 6.69, P < .01) and with significant improvements in all other predefined (secondary) measures. On follow-up, QoL improved in 52% of intervention patients as compared with 25% of controls; similar differences were observed for anxiety. Those differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS:

A self-injection (with an empty syringe) procedure in a clinic setting improves adolescents' and parents' comfort level with self-injecting. It may translate into substantial clinical benefits should self-injection be needed.

KEYWORDS:

Anxiety; Epinephrine; Exposure; Food allergy; Self-management

PMID:
28117270
DOI:
10.1016/j.jaip.2016.12.016
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center