Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 18;12(1):e0169843. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169843. eCollection 2017.

Drawbacks of Dialysis Procedures for Removal of EDTA.

Author information

1
Department of Chemical and Physical Biology, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, C.S.I.C., Madrid, Spain.
2
Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, C.S.I.C., Madrid, Spain.

Abstract

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is a chelating agent commonly used in protein purification, both to eliminate contaminating divalent cations and to inhibit protease activity. For a number of subsequent applications EDTA needs to be exhaustively removed. Most purification methods rely in extensive dialysis and/or gel filtration in order to exchange or remove protein buffer components, including metal chelators. We report here that dialysis protocols, even as extensive as those typically employed for protein refolding, may not effectively remove EDTA, which is reduced only by approximately two-fold and it also persists after spin-column gel filtration, as determined by NMR and by colorimetric methods. Remarkably, the most efficient removal was achieved by ultrafiltration, after which EDTA became virtually undetectable. These results highlight a potentially widespread source of experimental variability affecting free divalent cation concentrations in protein applications.

PMID:
28099451
PMCID:
PMC5242421
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0169843
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center