Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Physiol Anthropol. 2017 Jan 13;36(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s40101-016-0117-3.

Does waterfall aerosol influence mucosal immunity and chronic stress? A randomized controlled clinical trial.

Author information

1
Institute of Ecomedicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 22, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
2
Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 22, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
3
Gastein Research Institute, Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 22, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
4
Department for Radon Therapy Research, Ludwig Boltzmann Cluster for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Strubergasse 22, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
5
Institute of Physics, University of Belgrade, Pregrevica 118, 11080, Belgrade, Serbia.
6
Department of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, Hellbrunner Str. 34, 5020, Salzburg, Austria.
7
Institute of Ecomedicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Strubergasse 22, 5020, Salzburg, Austria. arnulf.hartl@pmu.ac.at.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The specific microclimate of alpine waterfalls with high levels of ionized water aerosols has been suggested to trigger beneficial immunological and psychological effects. In the present three-armed randomized controlled clinical study, we focused on effects on (i) immunological reagibility, on (ii) physiological stress responses, and on (iii) stress-related psychological parameters.

METHODS:

People with moderate to high stress levels (n = 65) spent an active sojourn with daily hiking tours in the National Park Hohe Tauern (Großkirchheim, Austria). Half of the group was exposed to water aerosol of an alpine waterfall for 1 h/day (first arm, n = 33), whereas the other half spent the same time at a distant site (second arm, n = 32). A third arm (control, n = 26) had no intervention (except vaccination) and stayed at home, maintaining their usual lifestyle. The effect of the interventions on the immune system was tested by oral vaccination with an approved cholera vaccine and measuring specific salivary IgA antibody titers. Lung function was determined by peak expiratory flow measurement. Electric skin conductance, heart rate, and adaption of respiration rate were assessed as physiological stress parameters. Psychological stress-related parameters were analyzed by questionnaires and scales.

RESULTS:

Compared to the control group, both intervention groups showed improvement of the lung function and of most physiological stress test parameters. Analysis of the mucosal immune response revealed a waterfall-specific beneficial effect with elevated IgA titers in the waterfall group. In line with these results, exposure to waterfall revealed an additional benefit concerning psychological parameters such as subjective stress perception (measured via visual analog scale), the Global Severity Index (GSI), and the Positive Symptom Total (PST).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study provides new data, which strongly support an "added value" of exposure to waterfall microclimate when combined with a therapeutic sojourn at high altitude including regular physical activity.

KEYWORDS:

Alpine space; Burnout prevention; Chronic stress; Green exercise; High-altitude climate therapy; Ionized water aerosol; Mountain hiking; Mucosal immune response; Waterfall

PMID:
28086991
PMCID:
PMC5237191
DOI:
10.1186/s40101-016-0117-3
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center