Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
J Cancer Res Ther. 2016 Jul-Sep;12(3):1138-1143. doi: 10.4103/0973-1482.164704.

Questionnaire survey to assess the pattern and characteristics of cell-phone usage among Indian oncologists.

Author information

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Fortis Memorial Research Institute, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
  • 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

Obtain baseline data of cell-phone usage in the medical (MO), surgical (SO) and radiation (RO) oncology community practicing in India.

MATERIALS AND METHODS:

Indigenously prepared cell-phone usage related questionnaire was used in the present study after approval by the Institutional Ethics/Scientific Committees. The questionnaire had 41 items and was made to assess the cell-phone usage parameters, utility in clinical practice, awareness, and to compare parameters between oncology specialties. Between November 2009 and January 2010, the questionnaire was sent as an E-mail attachment to 200 oncologists in India.

RESULTS:

In all, 123 responses were received (61% responders); 84 (68.3%) were RO. The median age of responders was 35 years. Overall, 80% felt handicapped without cell-phone. The Mean cell-phone score, an index to assess overall usefulness over a score of 1-10, was 6.46 (median 7, standard deviation 1.709). There was no significant difference between RO, MO and SO in duration of usage (P = 0.235), number of cell-phones (P = 0.496), call duration per day (P = 0.490) and dependence on cell-phone (P = 0.574). Age of starting cell-phone usage was earlier in RO (P = 0.086). Professional usage was significantly more by MO and SO compared to RO (P < 0.001); however, the former were less aware of any potential cell-phone hazards compared to RO (P < 0.007).

CONCLUSION:

The results of the first such questionnaire based study have been presented. Most oncologists consider cell-phones a useful tool in patient care. More RO are aware of potential cell-phone hazards compared to non-RO's.

PMID:
28054525
DOI:
10.4103/0973-1482.164704
[PubMed - in process]
Free full text
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Medknow Publications and Media Pvt Ltd
    Loading ...
    Support Center