Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Pharm Pract (Granada). 2016 Oct-Dec;14(4):847. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2016.04.847. Epub 2016 Dec 15.

Analysis of ten years of publishing in Pharmacy Practice.

Author information

1
Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Program, Department of Pharmacy. Federal University of ParanĂ¡ . Curitiba ( Brazil ). mmendesantonio@gmail.com.
2
Pharmaceutical Sciences Postgraduate Program, Department of Pharmacy. Federal University of ParanĂ¡ . Curitiba ( Brazil ). fer_stumpf_tonin@hotmail.com.
3
Editor-in-chief, Pharmacy Practice. Institute for Medicines Research (iMed.ULisboa), Department of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lisbon . Lisbon ( Portugal ). f-llimos@ff.ul.pt.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

The aim of this study is to characterize the patterns and trends in the editorial process and features of the first decade of Pharmacy Practice, with the final goal of initiating a benchmarking process to enhance the quality of the journal.

METHODS:

Metadata of all of the articles published from 2006 issue #3 to 2016 issue #2 were extracted from PubMed and complemented by a manual data extraction process on the full-text articles. Citations of these articles were retrieved from Web of Science (WOS), Scopus, and Google Scholar on August 15, 2016. The references from all of the articles published by Pharmacy Practice in 2015 were also extracted. International collaboration was explored with a network analysis.

RESULTS:

A total of 40 issues were published in this timespan, including 349 articles, 91.1% of which were original research articles. The number of citations received by these articles varies from 809, as reported by the WOS, to the 1162 reported by Scopus and the 2610 reported by Google Scholar. The journals cited by Pharmacy Practice are mainly pharmacy journals, including Pharm Pract (Granada), Int J Clin Pharm, Am J Health-Syst Pharm, Am J Pharm Educ, and Ann Pharmacother. Only 17.3% of the articles involved international collaboration. Delays in the editorial process increased in 2013, mainly due to an increase in acceptance delay (mean=138 days).

CONCLUSION:

Pharmacy Practice has improved its visibility and impact over the past decade, especially after 2014, when the journal became indexed in PubMed Central. The editorial process duration is one of the weaknesses that should be tackled. Further studies should investigate if the low international collaboration rate is common across other pharmacy journals.

KEYWORDS:

Authorship; Bibliometrics; Cooperative Behavior; Periodicals as Topic; Pharmacists; Publishing

Conflict of interest statement

FF-L is editor-in-chief of Pharmacy Practice. No other conflicts of interest to declare.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center