Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Mar;82(3):518-523. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001339.

The mangled extremity score and amputation: Time for a revision.

Author information

1
From the Department of Surgery (M.N.L., J.D.), Divisions of Vascular and Trauma Surgery, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California; Department of Surgery (A.S., M.M.K.), University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California; Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics (C-S.L.), University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California, Department of Statistics (Y.L.), University of California, Davis, Sacramento, California; Department of Surgery (S.S.), Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Surgery (T.S., T.E.R.), R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland; Department of Surgery (J.B.H.), Center for Translational Injury Research, University of Texas Health Sciences Center Houston, Houston, Texas.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The Mangled Extremity Severity Score (MESS) was developed 25 years ago in an attempt to use the extent of skeletal and soft tissue injury, limb ischemia, shock, and age to predict the need for amputation after extremity injury. Subsequently, there have been mixed reviews as to the use of this score. We hypothesized that the MESS, when applied to a data set collected prospectively in modern times, would not correlate with the need for amputation.

METHODS:

We applied the MESS to patient data collected in the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma PROspective Vascular Injury Treatment registry. This registry contains prospectively collected demographic, diagnostic, treatment, and outcome data.

RESULTS:

Between 2013 and 2015, 230 patients with lower extremity arterial injuries were entered into the PROspective Vascular Injury Treatment registry. Most were male with a mean age of 34 years (range, 4-92 years) and a blunt mechanism of injury at a rate of 47.4%. A MESS of 8 or greater was associated with a longer stay in the hospital (median, 22.5 (15, 29) vs 12 (6, 21); p = 0.006) and intensive care unit (median, 6 (2, 13) vs 3 (1, 6); p = 0.03). Of the patients' limbs, 81.3% were ultimately salvaged (median MESS, 4 (3, 5)), and 18.7% required primary or secondary amputation (median MESS, 6 (4, 8); p < 0.001). However, after controlling for confounding variables including mechanism of injury, degree of arterial injury, injury severity score, arterial location, and concomitant injuries, the MESS between salvaged and amputated limbs was no longer significantly different. Importantly, a MESS of 8 predicted in-hospital amputation in only 43.2% of patients.

CONCLUSION:

Therapeutic advances in the treatment of vascular, orthopedic, neurologic, and soft tissue injuries have reduced the diagnostic accuracy of the MESS in predicting the need for amputation. There remains a significant need to examine additional predictors of amputation following severe extremity injury.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Prospective, prognostic study, level III.

PMID:
28030489
PMCID:
PMC5321791
DOI:
10.1097/TA.0000000000001339
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center