Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Dlib Mag. 2016 Sep-Oct;22(9-10). doi: 10.1045/september2016-mishra.

Quantifying Conceptual Novelty in the Biomedical Literature.

Author information

1
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Abstract

We introduce several measures of novelty for a scientific article in MEDLINE based on the temporal profiles of its assigned Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). First, temporal profiles for all MeSH terms (and pairs of MeSH terms) were characterized empirically and modelled as logistic growth curves. Second, a paper's novelty is captured by its youngest MeSH (and pairs of MeSH) as measured in years and volume of prior work. Across all papers in MEDLINE published since 1985, we find that individual concept novelty is rare (2.7% of papers have a MeSH ≤ 3 years old; 1.0% have a MeSH ≤ 20 papers old), while combinatorial novelty is the norm (68% have a pair of MeSH ≤ 3 years old; 90% have a pair of MeSH ≤ 10 papers old). Furthermore, these novelty measures exhibit complex correlations with article impact (as measured by citations received) and authors' professional age.

KEYWORDS:

Bibliometrics; MEDLINE; Novelty

PMID:
27942200
PMCID:
PMC5142764

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center