Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Clin Oncol. 2017 Feb;35(4):412-420. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.69.2160. Epub 2016 Dec 12.

Results From the Phase III Randomized Trial of Onartuzumab Plus Erlotinib Versus Erlotinib in Previously Treated Stage IIIB or IV Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: METLung.

Author information

1
David R. Spigel, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN; Martin J. Edelman, University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD; Kenneth O'Byrne, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Luis Paz-Ares, Hospital Universitario Doce de Octubre and Centro Nacional de Investigaciones Oncológicas, Madrid, Spain; Simonetta Mocci, See Phan, David S. Shames, Dustin Smith, Wei Yu, and Virginia E. Paton, Genentech, South San Francisco, CA; and Tony Mok, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Special Administrative Region, People's Republic of China.

Abstract

Purpose The phase III OAM4971g study (METLung) examined the efficacy and safety of onartuzumab plus erlotinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer selected by MET immunohistochemistry whose disease had progressed after treatment with a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned at a one-to-one ratio to receive onartuzumab (15 mg/kg intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle) plus daily oral erlotinib 150 mg or intravenous placebo plus daily oral erlotinib 150 mg. The primary end point was overall survival (OS) in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary end points included median progression-free survival, overall response rate, biomarker analysis, and safety. Results A total of 499 patients were enrolled (onartuzumab, n = 250; placebo, n = 249). Median OS was 6.8 versus 9.1 months for onartuzumab versus placebo (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.65; P = .067), with a greater number of deaths in the onartuzumab arm (130 [52%] v 114 [46%]). Median progression-free survival was 2.7 versus 2.6 months (stratified HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.20; P = .92), and overall response rate was 8.4% and 9.6% for onartuzumab versus placebo, respectively. Exploratory analyses using MET fluorescence in situ hybridization status and gene expression showed no benefit for onartuzumab; patients with EGFR mutations showed a trend toward shorter OS with onartuzumab treatment (HR, 4.68; 95% CI, 0.97 to 22.63). Grade 3 to 5 adverse events were reported by 56.0% and 51.2% of patients, with serious AEs in 33.9% and 30.7%, for experimental versus control arms, respectively. Conclusion Onartuzumab plus erlotinib did not improve clinical outcomes, with shorter OS in the onartuzumab arm, compared with erlotinib in patients with MET-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

PMID:
27937096
DOI:
10.1200/JCO.2016.69.2160
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center