Format

Send to

Choose Destination
JAMA Surg. 2017 Apr 1;152(4):360-368. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4686.

Mortality and Prehospital Blood Pressure in Patients With Major Traumatic Brain Injury: Implications for the Hypotension Threshold.

Author information

1
Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix2Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson.
2
Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix3The Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson.
3
Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix2Department of Emergency Medicine, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson4Arizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of Emergency Medical Services, Phoenix.
4
Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix4Arizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of Emergency Medical Services, Phoenix.
5
The Mel and Enid Zuckerman College of Public Health, University of Arizona, Tucson.
6
Arizona Emergency Medicine Research Center, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix.
7
Arizona Department of Health Services, Bureau of Emergency Medical Services, Phoenix.
8
Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix Children's Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona6Department of Child Health, The University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix.

Abstract

Importance:

Current prehospital traumatic brain injury guidelines use a systolic blood pressure threshold of less than 90 mm Hg for treating hypotension for individuals 10 years and older based on studies showing higher mortality when blood pressure drops below this level. However, the guidelines also acknowledge the weakness of the supporting evidence.

Objective:

To evaluate whether any statistically supportable threshold between systolic pressure and mortality emerges from the data a priori, without assuming that a cut point exists.

Design, Setting, and Participants:

Observational evaluation of a large prehospital database established as a part of the Excellence in Prehospital Injury Care Traumatic Brain Injury Study. Patients from the preimplementation cohort (January 2007 to March 2014) 10 years and older with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury (Barell Matrix Type 1 classification, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision head region severity score of 3 or greater, and/or Abbreviated Injury Scale head-region severity score of 3 or greater) and a prehospital systolic pressure between 40 and 119 mm Hg were included. The generalized additive model and logistic regression were used to determine the association between systolic pressure and probability of death, adjusting for significant/important confounders.

Main Outcomes and Measures:

The main outcome measure was in-hospital mortality.

Results:

Among the 3844 included patients, 2565 (66.7%) were male, and the median (range) age was 35 (10-99) years. The model revealed a monotonically decreasing association between systolic pressure and adjusted probability of death across the entire range (ie, from 40 to 119 mm Hg). Each 10-point increase of systolic pressure was associated with a decrease in the adjusted odds of death of 18.8% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.812; 95% CI, 0.748-0.883). Thus, the adjusted odds of mortality increased as much for a drop from 110 to 100 mm Hg as for a drop from 90 to 80 mm Hg, and so on throughout the range.

Conclusions and Relevance:

We found a linear association between lowest prehospital systolic blood pressure and severity-adjusted probability of mortality across an exceptionally wide range. There is no identifiable threshold or inflection point between 40 and 119 mm Hg. Thus, in patients with traumatic brain injury, the concept that 90 mm Hg represents a unique or important physiological cut point may be wrong. Furthermore, clinically meaningful hypotension may not be as low as current guidelines suggest. Randomized trials evaluating treatment levels significantly above 90 mm Hg are needed.

PMID:
27926759
PMCID:
PMC5637731
DOI:
10.1001/jamasurg.2016.4686
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center