Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2017 Feb 1;312(2):H289-H304. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00339.2016. Epub 2016 Dec 6.

Type of supplemented simple sugar, not merely calorie intake, determines adverse effects on metabolism and aortic function in female rats.

Author information

1
Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Therapeutic Chemistry, School of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
2
Department of Physiology & Pharmacology, Thomas J. Long School of Pharmacy & Health Sciences, University of the Pacific, Stockton, California.
3
Institute of Biomedicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; and.
4
Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición, Madrid, Spain.
5
Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology, and Therapeutic Chemistry, School of Pharmacy and Food Sciences, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain; alegret@ub.edu.

Abstract

High consumption of simple sugars causes adverse cardiometabolic effects. We investigated the mechanisms underlying the metabolic and vascular effects of glucose or fructose intake and determined whether these effects are exclusively related to increased calorie consumption. Female Sprague-Dawley rats were supplemented with 20% wt/vol glucose or fructose for 2 mo, and plasma analytes and aortic response to vasodilator and vasoconstrictor agents were determined. Expression of molecules associated with lipid metabolism, insulin signaling, and vascular response were evaluated in hepatic and/or aortic tissues. Caloric intake was increased in both sugar-supplemented groups vs. control and in glucose- vs. fructose-supplemented rats. Hepatic lipogenesis was induced in both groups. Plasma triglycerides were increased only in the fructose group, together with decreased expression of carnitine palmitoyltransferase-1A and increased microsomal triglyceride transfer protein expression in the liver. Plasma adiponectin and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor (PPAR)-α expression was increased only by glucose supplementation. Insulin signaling in liver and aorta was impaired in both sugar-supplemented groups, but the effect was more pronounced in the fructose group. Fructose supplementation attenuated aortic relaxation response to a nitric oxide (NO) donor, whereas glucose potentiated it. Phenylephrine-induced maximal contractions were reduced in the glucose group, which could be related to increased endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) phosphorylation and subsequent elevated basal NO in the glucose group. In conclusion, despite higher caloric intake in glucose-supplemented rats, fructose caused worse metabolic and vascular responses. This may be because of the elevated adiponectin level and the subsequent enhancement of PPARα and eNOS phosphorylation in glucose-supplemented rats.

NEW & NOTEWORTHY:

This is the first study comparing the effects of glucose and fructose consumption on metabolic factors and aortic function in female rats. Our results show that, although total caloric consumption was higher in glucose-supplemented rats, fructose ingestion had a greater impact in inducing metabolic and aortic dysfunction.

KEYWORDS:

adiponectin; fructose; glucose; insulin resistance; liver

Comment in

PMID:
27923787
PMCID:
PMC5336577
DOI:
10.1152/ajpheart.00339.2016
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

MeSH terms, Substances, Secondary source ID, Grant support

MeSH terms

Substances

Secondary source ID

Grant support

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center