Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Hum Exp Toxicol. 2016 Nov 24. pii: 0960327116679715. [Epub ahead of print]

No support for lipid rescue in oral poisoning: A systematic review and analysis of 160 published cases.

Author information

  • 1Department of Surgery, Norrtälje Sjukhus, TioHundra AB, Sweden.
  • 2Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Norrtälje Sjukhus, TioHundra AB, Sweden.
  • 3Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • 4Swedish Poisons Information Centre, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • 5Department of Psychiatry, Norrtälje sjukhus, TioHundra AB, Sweden.
  • 6Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden Jonas.hojer@gic.se.

Abstract

Lipid rescue is used as treatment of various poisonings despite weak scientific evidence. Some experimental studies have indicated a positive effect, but others have not. Clinical studies are lacking, wherefore a systematic review of virtually all published human case reports is presented. The case reports were searched for in PubMed and Web of Science and examined by two experts according to an assessment form grading the probability for a causal connection between lipid rescue and improved symptoms. A total of 160 cases were finally included, of which 30 had no positive effect of lipid rescue. Among the 130 included cases with alleged positive effect, 94 were oral poisonings and 36 were cases with local anesthetic systemic toxicity (LAST). The experts' assessment resulted in a "certain" causal connection in three cases with LAST but not in oral poisoning. Moreover, the mean assessment score among the oral poisonings was significantly worse than the corresponding score in the cases with LAST. The average log p-value of the main toxins among the oral poisonings was significantly lower than the corresponding p-value in the cases with LAST. Among the oral poisonings, 91% had received some other resuscitative treatment more or less simultaneously with lipid rescue. Considering the findings of this study and the increasingly reported adverse effects of lipid rescue, it's reasonable to strictly limit its use in clinical practice. We would not recommend it in oral poisonings.

KEYWORDS:

Intravenous lipid emulsion; lipid rescue; poisoning

PMID:
27885103
DOI:
10.1177/0960327116679715
[PubMed - as supplied by publisher]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Atypon
    Loading ...
    Support Center