Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMJ. 2016 Nov 16;355:i5650. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i5650.

Effect of early supervised physiotherapy on recovery from acute ankle sprain: randomised controlled trial.

Author information

1
Queen's University Department of Emergency Medicine, Kingston, ON, Canada.
2
Kingston General Hospital Research Institute, Kingston, ON, Canada.
3
Queen's University Department of Public Health Sciences, Kingston, ON, Canada.
4
Queen's University School of Rehabilitation Therapy, Kingston, ON, Canada.
5
The Human Mobility Research Centre, Kingston General Hospital and Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
6
Queen's University Division of Orthopaedics, Kingston, ON, Canada.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

 To assess the efficacy of a programme of supervised physiotherapy on the recovery of simple grade 1 and 2 ankle sprains.

DESIGN:

 A randomised controlled trial of 503 participants followed for six months.

SETTING:

 Participants were recruited from two tertiary acute care settings in Kingston, ON, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS:

 The broad inclusion criteria were patients aged ≥16 presenting for acute medical assessment and treatment of a simple grade 1 or 2 ankle sprain. Exclusions were patients with multiple injuries, other conditions limiting mobility, and ankle injuries that required immobilisation and those unable to accommodate the time intensive study protocol.

INTERVENTION:

 Participants received either usual care, consisting of written instructions regarding protection, rest, cryotherapy, compression, elevation, and graduated weight bearing activities, or usual care enhanced with a supervised programme of physiotherapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES:

 The primary outcome of efficacy was the proportion of participants reporting excellent recovery assessed with the foot and ankle outcome score (FAOS). Excellent recovery was defined as a score ≥450/500 at three months. A difference of at least 15% increase in the absolute proportion of participants with excellent recovery was deemed clinically important. Secondary analyses included the assessment of excellent recovery at one and six months; change from baseline using continuous scores at one, three, and six months; and clinical and biomechanical measures of ankle function, assessed at one, three, and six months.

RESULTS:

 The absolute proportion of patients achieving excellent recovery at three months was not significantly different between the physiotherapy (98/229, 43%) and usual care (79/214, 37%) arms (absolute difference 6%, 95% confidence interval -3% to 15%). The observed trend towards benefit with physiotherapy did not increase in the per protocol analysis and was in the opposite direction by six months. These trends remained similar and were never statistically or clinically important when the FAOS was analysed as a continuous change score.

CONCLUSIONS:

 In a general population of patients seeking hospital based acute care for simple ankle sprains, there is no evidence to support a clinically important improvement in outcome with the addition of supervised physiotherapy to usual care, as provided in this protocol.Trial registration ISRCTN 74033088 (www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN74033088).

PMID:
27852621
PMCID:
PMC5112179
DOI:
10.1136/bmj.i5650
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organisation for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous three years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center