Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Environ Manage. 2017 Jan 15;186(Pt 1):64-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.085. Epub 2016 Nov 8.

Who collaborates and why: Assessment and diagnostic of governance network integration for salmon restoration in Puget Sound, USA.

Author information

1
School of Geographical Sciences and Urban Planning, Arizona State University, USA; Department of Geography, McGill University, Canada. Electronic address: jesse.sayles@mail.mcgill.ca.
2
Department of Environment and Society, Utah State University, USA; Center for Behavior, Institutions and the Environment, Arizona State University, USA.

Abstract

Governance silos are settings in which different organizations work in isolation and avoid sharing information and strategies. Siloes are a fundamental challenge for environmental planning and problem solving, which generally requires collaboration. Siloes can be overcome by creating governance networks. Studying the structure and function of these networks is important for understanding how to create institutional arrangements that can respond to the biophysical dynamics of a specific natural resource system (i.e., social-ecological, or institutional fit). Using the case of salmon restoration in a sub-basin of Puget Sound, USA, we assess network integration, considering three different reasons for network collaborations (i.e., mandated, funded, and shared interest relationships) and analyze how these different collaboration types relate to productivity based on practitioner's assessments. We also illustrate how specific and targeted network interventions might enhance the network. To do so, we use a mixed methods approach that combines quantitative social network analysis (SNA) and qualitative interview analysis. Overall, the sub-basin's governance network is fairly well integrated, but several concerning gaps exist. Funded, mandated, and shared interest relationships lead to different network patterns. Mandated relationships are associated with lower productivity than shared interest relationships, highlighting the benefit of genuine collaboration in collaborative watershed governance. Lastly, quantitative and qualitative data comparisons strengthen recent calls to incorporate geographic space and the role of individual actors versus organizational culture into natural resource governance research using SNA.

KEYWORDS:

Collaborative management; Environmental governance; Scale mismatch; Social network analysis; Social-ecological fit; Watershed restoration

PMID:
27832929
DOI:
10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.09.085
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center