Defining Ecosystem Assets for Natural Capital Accounting

PLoS One. 2016 Nov 9;11(11):e0164460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164460. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

In natural capital accounting, ecosystems are assets that provide ecosystem services to people. Assets can be measured using both physical and monetary units. In the international System of Environmental-Economic Accounting, ecosystem assets are generally valued on the basis of the net present value of the expected flow of ecosystem services. In this paper we argue that several additional conceptualisations of ecosystem assets are needed to understand ecosystems as assets, in support of ecosystem assessments, ecosystem accounting and ecosystem management. In particular, we define ecosystems' capacity and capability to supply ecosystem services, as well as the potential supply of ecosystem services. Capacity relates to sustainable use levels of multiple ecosystem services, capability involves prioritising the use of one ecosystem service over a basket of services, and potential supply considers the ability of ecosystems to generate services regardless of demand for these services. We ground our definitions in the ecosystem services and accounting literature, and illustrate and compare the concepts of flow, capacity, capability, and potential supply with a range of conceptual and real-world examples drawn from case studies in Europe and North America. Our paper contributes to the development of measurement frameworks for natural capital to support environmental accounting and other assessment frameworks.

MeSH terms

  • Accounting*
  • Carbon Dioxide / metabolism
  • Conservation of Natural Resources / economics*
  • Conservation of Natural Resources / methods*
  • Ecosystem*
  • Europe
  • Forestry
  • Housing
  • Humans
  • North America
  • Pinus / growth & development
  • Soil / chemistry

Substances

  • Soil
  • Carbon Dioxide

Grants and funding

The author(s) received no specific funding for this work. K.J. Bagstad was seconded by USGS to the World Bank, but his salary was paid by USGS, during the period he worked on this manuscript. The World Bank (or any other organization for that matter) did not have any influence on the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.