Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2018 Feb;71(2):499-521. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1256416. Epub 2018 Jan 1.

The role of decision criterion in the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) false recognition memory: False memory falls and rises as a function of restriction on criterion setting.

Author information

1
Department of Psychological Science, University of Texas-Rio Grande Valley, Edinburg, TX, USA.

Abstract

How much of the Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) false memory is attributable to decision criterion is so far a controversial issue. Previous studies typically used explicit warnings against accepting the critical lure to investigate this issue. The assumption is that if the false memory results from using a liberally biased criterion, it should be greatly reduced or eliminated by an explicit warning against accepting the critical lure. Results showed that warning was generally ineffective. We asked the question of whether subjects can substantially reduce false recognition without being warned when the test forces them to make a distinction between true and false memories. Using a two-alternative forced choice in which criterion plays a relatively smaller role, we showed that subjects could indeed greatly reduce the rate of false recognition. However, when the forced-choice restriction was removed from the two-item choice test, the rate of false recognition rebounded to that of the hit for studied list words, indicating the role of criterion in false recognition.

KEYWORDS:

Criterion shift account; Deese–Roediger–McDermott false memory; Deese–Roediger–McDermott false recognition; residual experiences; two-alternative forced choice criterion-restricted; yes/no versus two-alternative choice

PMID:
27808007
DOI:
10.1080/17470218.2016.1256416
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Loading ...
Support Center