Format

Send to

Choose Destination
See comment in PubMed Commons below
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2017 Apr;56(4):341-347. doi: 10.1177/0009922816675013. Epub 2016 Oct 24.

Asthma Control Test.

Author information

1
1 The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
2
2 University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
3
3 American Academy of Pediatrics, Elk Grove Village, IL, USA.

Abstract

We compared results of a modified version of the Asthma Control Test using parent proxy report (PP-ACT) with results reported by children and parents using the validated Childhood-Asthma Control Test (C-ACT). 104 parent-child dyads with a child aged 6 to 12 years with asthma were randomized to complete PP-ACT followed by C-ACT or C-ACT followed by PP-ACT. Scores ≤19 indicated uncontrolled asthma. We calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for the PP-ACT in comparison with the C-ACT, and calculated concordance between the 2 scales. The PP-ACT had sensitivity of 86% and negative predictive value of 88% for detecting uncontrolled asthma. More than 75% of surveys were concordant (κ = 0.54, moderate agreement). Our results suggest that while the PP-ACT missed few children with uncontrolled asthma and may simplify reporting of asthma control in circumstances when child report is not feasible or creates barriers to survey receipt, limitations of proxy reporting should be considered.

KEYWORDS:

Asthma Control Test; asthma; parent proxy reporting

PMID:
27798397
DOI:
10.1177/0009922816675013
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
PubMed Commons home

PubMed Commons

0 comments
How to join PubMed Commons

    Supplemental Content

    Full text links

    Icon for Atypon
    Loading ...
    Support Center