Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Trop Med Int Health. 2017 Jan;22(1):32-40. doi: 10.1111/tmi.12802. Epub 2016 Dec 8.

Quantifying the risk of nosocomial infection within Ebola Holding Units: a retrospective cohort study of negative patients discharged from five Ebola Holding Units in Western Area, Sierra Leone.

Author information

1
King's Sierra Leone Partnership, King's College London, London, UK.
2
Hospital for Tropical Diseases, University College Hospital London, London, UK.
3
Republic of Sierra Leone Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
4
Connaught Government Hospital, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
5
Lumley Government Hospital, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
6
Newton Community Health Centre, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
7
Rokupa Government Hospital, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
8
Macauley Street Government Hospital, Freetown, Sierra Leone.
9
Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES:

A central pillar in the response to the 2014 Ebola virus disease (EVD) epidemic in Sierra Leone was the role of Ebola Holding Units (EHUs). These units isolated patients meeting a suspect case definition, tested them for EVD, initiated appropriate early treatment and discharged negative patients to onward inpatient care or home. Positive patients were referred to Ebola Treatment Centres. We aimed to estimate the risk of nosocomial transmission within these EHUs.

METHODS:

We followed up a cohort of 543 patients discharged with a negative EVD test from five EHUs in the Western Area, Sierra Leone, and examined all line-listed subsequent EVD tests from any facility in the Western Area to see whether the patient was retested within 30 days, matching by name, age and address. We defined possible readmissions as having the same name and age but uncertain address, and confirmed readmissions where name, age and address matched.

RESULTS:

We found a positive readmission rate of 3.3% (18 cases), which included 1.5% confirmed readmissions (8 cases) and 1.8% possible readmissions (10 cases). This is lower than rates previously reported. We cannot ascertain whether EVD was acquired within the EHUs or from re-exposure in the community. No demographic or clinical variables were identified as risk factors for positive readmission, likely due to our small sample size.

CONCLUSIONS:

These findings support the EHU model as a safe method for isolation of suspect EVD patients and their role in limiting the spread of EVD.

KEYWORDS:

Ebola Holding Unit; Ebola virus disease; Sierra Leona; Sierra Leone; Unité de Rétention Ebola; enfermedad del virus del Ébola; higiene; hygiene; hygiène; infection prevention and control; maladie du virus Ebola; nosocomial transmission; prevención y control de la infección; prévention et lutte contre les infections; transmisión nosocomial; transmission nosocomiale; unidades de contención del Ébola

PMID:
27782349
DOI:
10.1111/tmi.12802
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center