Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2017 Feb;26(2):222-227. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0434. Epub 2016 Oct 14.

Screening Men at Increased Risk for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Model Estimates of Benefits and Harms.

Author information

1
Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington. rgulati@fredhutch.org.
2
Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington.
3
Division of Medical Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Guidelines for PSA screening in subgroups with increased risk of prostate cancer diagnosis due to race or genotype are underdeveloped. Our goal was to investigate types of increased prostate cancer risk and implications for targeted screening.

METHODS:

We investigated computer simulation of subgroups with average and hypothetical increased risk(s) of onset of latent disease, progression, and/or cancer-specific death. For each subgroup, we predicted lifetime probabilities of overdiagnosis and life saved under more and less intensive PSA screening strategies. An application estimated risks of onset among BRCA1/2 mutation carriers in the Identification of Men with a genetic predisposition to ProstAte Cancer: Targeted screening in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and controls (IMPACT) study using maximum likelihood.

RESULTS:

Our simulations implied PSA screening can save more lives among subgroups with increased risk than with average risk, but more intensive screening did not always improve harm-benefit trade-offs. IMPACT data were consistent with increased risks of onset among BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers [HR = 1.05; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.63-1.59 and HR = 1.81; 95% CI, 1.14-2.78, respectively]. Our analysis suggests screening BRCA2 mutation carriers earlier and more frequently than the average-risk population, but a lower PSA threshold for biopsy is unlikely to improve outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS:

Effective screening in men with increased prostate cancer risk depends on the manner in which the risk is increased. More intensive screening is not always optimal.

IMPACT:

Guidelines for screening men at increased prostate cancer risk should consider the mechanism inducing the increased risk. Although the benefit of screening may be greater in men with increased risks, more intensive screening is not always appropriate. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 26(2); 222-7. ©2016 AACR.

PMID:
27742670
PMCID:
PMC5296376
DOI:
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-16-0434
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no potential conflict of interest. Conflict of interest: None.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center