Format

Send to

Choose Destination
NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2016 Oct 13;26:16076. doi: 10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.76.

Inappropriate asthma therapy-a tale of two countries: a parallel population-based cohort study.

Author information

1
PELyon, HESPER 7425, Claude Bernard University, Lyon, France.
2
Research in Real Life Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
3
Respiratory Medicine, Croix Rousse University Hospital, Lyon, France.
4
Centre of Population Health Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
5
Optimum Patient Care Ltd, Cambridge, UK.
6
Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario de la Princesa (IISP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cátedra UAM-Linde, Madrid, Spain.
7
Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.

Abstract

Against recurrent controversies around the safety of short- and long-acting β2-agonists (SABA and LABA), and the National Review of Asthma Deaths inquiry in the United Kingdom, we investigated the prevalence of inappropriate therapy in asthma. Our study aimed to determine the prevalence of inappropriate use of asthma therapy in the United Kingdom and in France. Two interval, parallel, population-based cohorts (2007 and 2013) were developed in each country by using the UK OPCRD and the French EGB databases. Patients aged 6-40 years were studied over the 12-month period following inclusion, regarding overuse (⩾12 units) of SABA, use of LABA without inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) and ⩾2-fold higher use of LABA compared with that of ICS. Overall, 39,743 UK and 4,910 French patients were included in 2007, and 14,036 and 5,657 patients, respectively, were included in 2013. UK adults were more frequently exposed to SABA overuse compared with those in France in both periods, with an upward trend in the United Kingdom (P<0.05). In 2013, LABA use without ICS occurred in 0.1% and 1.5% of United Kingdom and French adults, respectively. Unbalanced use of LABA relative to ICS became marginal in both countries in 2013. Inappropriate use of therapy was less marked, but present, in children. Inappropriate therapy remains a common issue in asthma. Based on our figures, it may be estimated that >210,000 British and >190,000 French asthmatics aged 6-40 years were inappropriately treated in 2013.

PMID:
27735927
PMCID:
PMC5063035
DOI:
10.1038/npjpcrm.2016.76
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Conflict of interest statement

All authors have completed the Unified Competing Interest form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: AN and JBS are employees of RiRL. DR is Strategic Clinical Director at OPC. FA and DS are employees of OPC. DP has board membership with Aerocrine, Almirall, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Meda, Mundipharma, Napp, Novartis and Teva Pharmaceuticals; consultancy with Almirall, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, GlaxoSmithKline, Meda, Mundipharma, Napp, Novartis and Teva Pharmaceuticals; grants and unrestricted funding for investigator-initiated studies from UK National Health Service, British Lung Foundation, Aerocrine, AKL Ltd, Almirall, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Meda, Merck, Mundipharma, Napp, Novartis, Orion, Pfizer, Respiratory Effectiveness Group, Takeda, Teva Pharmaceuticals and Zentiva; payments for lectures/speaking from Almirall, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cipla, GlaxoSmithKline, Kyorin, Meda, Merck, Mundipharma, Novartis, Pfizer, SkyePharma, Takeda and Teva Pharmaceuticals; payment for manuscript preparation from Mundipharma and Teva Pharmaceuticals; patents (planned, pending or issued) from AKL Ltd; payment for the development of educational materials from GlaxoSmithKline and Novartis; stock/stock options from AKL Ltd that produces phytopharmaceuticals; owns 80% of Research in Real Life Ltd and its subsidiary social enterprise Optimum Patient Care; received payment for travel/accommodations/meeting expenses from Aerocrine, Boehringer Ingelheim, Mundipharma, Napp, Novartis and Teva Pharmaceuticals; funding for patient enrolment or completion of research from Almirall, Chiesi, Teva Pharmaceuticals and Zentiva; and peer reviewer for grant committees of the Medical Research Council (2014), Efficacy and Mechanism Evaluation programme (2012), HTA (2014). During the past 36 months, EVG received grants or personal fees from ALK ABELLO, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, IMS, LASER, Merck Sharp and Dohme. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Nature Publishing Group Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center