Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Genomics. 2016 Oct 7;17(1):787.

Does conservation account for splicing patterns?

Author information

1
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, 10 King's College Road, Toronto, M5S 3G4, Canada.
2
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Toronto, 10 King's College Road, Toronto, M5S 3G4, Canada. frey@psi.toronto.edu.
3
Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, University of Toronto, 160 College Street, Toronto, M5S 3E1, Canada. frey@psi.toronto.edu.
4
Program on Genetic Networks and Program on Neural Computation & Adaptive Perception, Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, 180 Dundas Street West, Suite 1400, Toronto, M5G 1Z8, Canada. frey@psi.toronto.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Alternative mRNA splicing is critical to proteomic diversity and tissue and species differentiation. Exclusion of cassette exons, also called exon skipping, is the most common type of alternative splicing in mammals.

RESULTS:

We present a computational model that predicts absolute (though not tissue-differential) percent-spliced-in of cassette exons more accurately than previous models, despite not using any 'hand-crafted' biological features such as motif counts. We achieve nearly identical performance using only the conservation score (mammalian phastCons) of each splice junction normalized by average conservation over 100 bp of the corresponding flanking intron, demonstrating that conservation is an unexpectedly powerful indicator of alternative splicing patterns. Using this method, we provide evidence that intronic splicing regulation occurs predominantly within 100 bp of the alternative splice sites and that conserved elements in this region are, as expected, functioning as splicing regulators. We show that among conserved cassette exons, increased conservation of flanking introns is associated with reduced inclusion. We also propose a new definition of intronic splicing regulatory elements (ISREs) that is independent of conservation, and show that most ISREs do not match known binding sites or splicing factors despite being predictive of percent-spliced-in.

CONCLUSIONS:

These findings suggest that one mechanism for the evolutionary transition from constitutive to alternative splicing is the emergence of cis-acting splicing inhibitors. The association of our ISREs with differences in splicing suggests the existence of novel RNA-binding proteins and/or novel splicing roles for known RNA-binding proteins.

KEYWORDS:

Alternative splicing; Conservation; Splicing regulation

PMID:
27717327
PMCID:
PMC5055659
DOI:
10.1186/s12864-016-3121-4
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center