Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Biol Psychiatry. 2017 Feb 15;81(4):347-357. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.06.023. Epub 2016 Jul 5.

Parsing Heterogeneity in the Brain Connectivity of Depressed and Healthy Adults During Positive Mood.

Author information

1
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh. Electronic address: rebecca.price@stanfordalumni.org.
2
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
3
Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh.
4
Perelman School of Medicine of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; Philadelphia Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

There is well-known heterogeneity in affective mechanisms in depression that may extend to positive affect. We used data-driven parsing of neural connectivity to reveal subgroups present across depressed and healthy individuals during positive processing, informing targets for mechanistic intervention.

METHODS:

Ninety-two individuals (68 depressed patients, 24 never-depressed control subjects) completed a sustained positive mood induction during functional magnetic resonance imaging. Directed functional connectivity paths within a depression-relevant network were characterized using Group Iterative Multiple Model Estimation (GIMME), a method shown to accurately recover the direction and presence of connectivity paths in individual participants. During model selection, individuals were clustered using community detection on neural connectivity estimates. Subgroups were externally tested across multiple levels of analysis.

RESULTS:

Two connectivity-based subgroups emerged: subgroup A, characterized by weaker connectivity overall, and subgroup B, exhibiting hyperconnectivity (relative to subgroup A), particularly among ventral affective regions. Subgroup predicted diagnostic status (subgroup B contained 81% of patients; 50% of control subjects; χ2 = 8.6, p = .003) and default mode network connectivity during a separate resting-state task. Among patients, subgroup B members had higher self-reported symptoms, lower sustained positive mood during the induction, and higher negative bias on a reaction-time task. Symptom-based depression subgroups did not predict these external variables.

CONCLUSIONS:

Neural connectivity-based categorization travels with diagnostic category and is clinically predictive, but not clinically deterministic. Both patients and control subjects showed heterogeneous, and overlapping, profiles. The larger and more severely affected patient subgroup was characterized by ventrally driven hyperconnectivity during positive processing. Data-driven parsing suggests heterogeneous substrates of depression and possible resilience in control subjects in spite of biological overlap.

KEYWORDS:

Community detection; Depression; Neural network connectivity; Positive mood; S-GIMME; fMRI

Comment in

PMID:
27712830
PMCID:
PMC5215983
DOI:
10.1016/j.biopsych.2016.06.023
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center