Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Nov;104(5):1424-1432. Epub 2016 Oct 5.

Accelerometer-measured dose-response for physical activity, sedentary time, and mortality in US adults.

Author information

1
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Nutritional Epidemiology Branch, charles.matthews2@nih.gov.
2
Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, Nutritional Epidemiology Branch.
3
Epidemiology and Genomics Research Program, and.
4
Information Management Services Inc., Silver Spring, MD.
5
Care and Public Health Research Institute School for Public Health and Primary Care, Department of Social Medicine, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
6
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Obesity Branch, Bethesda, MD.
7
Institute of Sports Science and Clinical Biomechanics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
8
National Institute on Aging, Intramural Research Program, Laboratory of Epidemiology, Demography, and Biometry, Bethesda, MD.
9
Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.

Erratum in

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity is recommended to maintain and improve health, but the mortality benefits of light activity and risk for sedentary time remain uncertain.

OBJECTIVES:

Using accelerometer-based measures, we 1) described the mortality dose-response for sedentary time and light- and moderate-to-vigorous-intensity activity using restricted cubic splines, and 2) estimated the mortality benefits associated with replacing sedentary time with physical activity, accounting for total activity.

DESIGN:

US adults (n = 4840) from NHANES (2003-2006) wore an accelerometer for ≤7 d and were followed prospectively for mortality. Proportional hazards models were used to estimate adjusted HRs and 95% CIs for mortality associations with time spent sedentary and in light- and moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity. Splines were used to graphically present behavior-mortality relation. Isotemporal models estimated replacement associations for sedentary time, and separate models were fit for low- (<5.8 h total activity/d) and high-active participants to account for nonlinear associations.

RESULTS:

Over a mean of 6.6 y, 700 deaths occurred. Compared with less-sedentary adults (6 sedentary h/d), those who spent 10 sedentary h/d had 29% greater risk (HR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.1, 1.5). Compared with those who did less light activity (3 h/d), those who did 5 h of light activity/d had 23% lower risk (HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.6, 1.0). There was no association with mortality for sedentary time or light or moderate-to-vigorous activity in highly active adults. In less-active adults, replacing 1 h of sedentary time with either light- or moderate-to-vigorous-intensity activity was associated with 18% and 42% lower mortality, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS:

Health promotion efforts for physical activity have mostly focused on moderate-to-vigorous activity. However, our findings derived from accelerometer-based measurements suggest that increasing light-intensity activity and reducing sedentary time are also important, particularly for inactive adults.

KEYWORDS:

accelerometer; light-intensity activity; moderate-to-vigorous intensity activity; mortality; physical activity; sedentary behavior

PMID:
27707702
PMCID:
PMC5081718
DOI:
10.3945/ajcn.116.135129
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center