Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Prev Med. 2016 Dec;93:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.034. Epub 2016 Sep 28.

Impact of provider-patient communication on cancer screening adherence: A systematic review.

Author information

1
George Mason University, 4400 University Drive, MSN 3D6, Fairfax, VA 22031, United States. Electronic address: epeters7@gmu.edu.
2
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10022, United States.
3
Wake Forest University, P.O. Box 7347, Winston-Salem, NC 27109, United States; Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Medical Center Blvd, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, United States.
4
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 641 Lexington Ave, 7th Floor, New York, NY 10022, United States; Hamad Medical Corporation, Doha, Qatar; Weill Cornell Medicine, Doha, Qatar.

Abstract

Cancer screening is critical for early detection and a lack of screening is associated with late-stage diagnosis and lower survival rates. The goal of this review was to analyze studies that focused on the role of provider-patient communication in screening behavior for cervical, breast, and colorectal cancer. A comprehensive search was conducted in four online databases between 1992 and 2016. Studies were included when the provider being studied was a primary care provider and the communication was face-to-face. The search resulted in 3252 records for review and 35 articles were included in the review. Studies were divided into three categories: studies comparing recommendation status to screening compliance; studies examining the relationship between communication quality and screening behavior; and intervention studies that used provider communication to improve screening behavior. There is overwhelming evidence that provider recommendation significantly improves screening rates. Studies examining quality of communication are heterogeneous in method, operationalization and results, but suggest giving information and shared decision making had a significant relationship with screening behavior. Intervention studies were similarly heterogeneous and showed positive results of communication interventions on screening behavior. Overall, results suggest that provider recommendation is necessary but not sufficient for optimal adherence to cancer screening guidelines. Quality studies suggest that provider-patient communication is more nuanced than just a simple recommendation. Discussions surrounding the recommendation may have an important bearing on a person's decision to get screened. Research needs to move beyond studies examining recommendations and adherence and focus more on the relationship between communication quality and screening adherence.

KEYWORDS:

Breast cancer; Cancer screening; Cervical cancer; Colorectal cancer; Professional-patient relationship; Review, systematic

PMID:
27687535
PMCID:
PMC5518612
DOI:
10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.09.034
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center