Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur J Pain. 2017 Feb;21(2):374-384. doi: 10.1002/ejp.935. Epub 2016 Sep 15.

Identifying fibromyalgia subgroups using cluster analysis: Relationships with clinical variables.

Author information

1
Department of Rheumatology, Chonnam National University Hospital & Medical School, Gwangju, Korea.
2
Department of Internal Medicine, Inje University Haeundae Paik Hospital, Busan, Korea.
3
Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheonan, Korea.
4
Department of Internal Medicine, Maryknoll Medical Center, Busan, Korea.
5
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu, Korea.
6
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Korea.
7
Department of Internal Medicine, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Korea.
8
Hanyang University College of Medicine and the Hospital for Rheumatic Diseases, Seoul, Korea.
9
Department of Allergy and Rheumatology, Ajou University Hospital, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
10
Department of Internal Medicine, Konyang University Medical School, Daejeon, Korea.
11
Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, Keimyung University, Daegu, Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Patients with fibromyalgia (FM) exhibit significant clinical heterogeneity, in terms of physical, social and psychological functions, as well as therapeutic responses. Here, we examined FM patients in terms of pain, physical, social and psychological variables to identify clinical subgroups that may be predictive of treatment patterns.

METHODS:

A total of 313 FM patients were interviewed using a structured questionnaire that included sociodemographic data, current or past FM symptoms and current use of relevant medications. A K-means cluster analysis was conducted using variables reflecting tender points, the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire, Beck Depression Inventory, State-Trait Anxiety Inventor and Social Support Scale.

RESULTS:

Four distinct clusters were identified in these patients. Group 1 was characterized by high pain levels, severe physical and mental impairment and low social support. Group 2 had moderate pain and physical impairment, mild mental impairment and moderate social support. Group 3 had moderate pain, low physical and moderate mental impairment and low social support. Group 4 had low pain levels, nearly normal physical and mental function and high social support. Group 1 was more often a current or past smoker, more likely to have a variety of symptoms, including swelling, cognitive dysfunction, dizziness, syncope, oesophageal dysmotility, dyspepsia, irritable bladder, vulvodynia and restless leg syndrome.

CONCLUSIONS:

We identified four subgroups of FM patients based on pain, physical, social and psychological function. These subgroups had different clinical symptoms and medication profiles, suggesting that FM may be better managed using a more comprehensive assessment of an individual patient's symptoms.

SIGNIFICANCE:

FM patients can be clustered into four distinct subgroups based on clinically measurable variables - pain, physical involvement, psychological function and social support. These subgroups had different clinical symptoms and medication profiles.

PMID:
27633925
DOI:
10.1002/ejp.935
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center