Format

Send to

Choose Destination
BMC Bioinformatics. 2016 Aug 31;17 Suppl 8:277. doi: 10.1186/s12859-016-1113-7.

Assessment of transfer methods for comparative genomics of regulatory networks in bacteria.

Author information

1
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC), Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA.
2
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Maryland Baltimore County (UMBC), Baltimore, MD, 21250, USA. erill@umbc.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Comparative genomics can leverage the vast amount of available genomic sequences to reconstruct and analyze transcriptional regulatory networks in Bacteria, but the efficacy of this approach hinges on the ability to transfer regulatory network information from reference species to the genomes under analysis. Several methods have been proposed to transfer regulatory information between bacterial species, but the paucity and distributed nature of experimental information on bacterial transcriptional networks have prevented their systematic evaluation.

RESULTS:

We report the compilation of a large catalog of transcription factor-binding sites across Bacteria and its use to systematically benchmark proposed transfer methods across pairs of bacterial species. We evaluate motif- and accuracy-based metrics to assess the results of regulatory network transfer and we identify the precision-recall area-under-the-curve as the best metric for this purpose due to the large class-imbalanced nature of the problem. Methods assuming conservation of the transcription factor-binding motif (motif-based) are shown to substantially outperform those assuming conservation of regulon composition (network-based), even though their efficiency can decrease sharply with increasing phylogenetic distance. Variations of the basic motif-based transfer method do not yield significant improvements in transfer accuracy. Our results indicate that detection of a large enough number of regulated orthologs is critical for network-based transfer methods, but that relaxing orthology requirements does not improve results. Using the transcriptional regulators LexA and Fur as case examples, we also show how DNA-binding domain sequence similarity can yield confounding results as an indicator of transfer efficiency for motif-based methods.

CONCLUSIONS:

Counter to standard practice, our evaluation of metrics to assess the efficiency of methods for regulatory network information transfer reveals that the area under precision-recall (PR) curves is a more precise and informative metric than that of receiver-operating-characteristic (ROC) curves, confirming similar findings in other class-imbalanced settings. Our systematic assessment of transfer methods reveals that simple approaches to both motif- and network-based transfer of regulatory information provide equal or better results than more elaborate methods. We also show that there are not effective predictors of transfer efficacy, substantiating the long-standing practice of manual curation in comparative genomics analyses.

KEYWORDS:

AUC; Benchmark; Comparative genomics; Motifs; Regulatory networks; Regulon; Site search; Transcription factor; Transfer

PMID:
27586594
PMCID:
PMC5009822
DOI:
10.1186/s12859-016-1113-7
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center