Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2016 Jul;12(6):1144-62. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2016.05.018.

Metabolic Surgery in the Treatment Algorithm for Type 2 Diabetes: A Joint Statement by International Diabetes Organizations.

Author information

1
King's College London, London, U.K.. Electronic address: francesco.rubino@kcl.ac.uk.
2
Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
3
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO.
4
Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH.
5
Imperial College London, London, U.K.
6
Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
7
University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
8
Peking University, Beijing, China.
9
Diabetes India, Mumbai, India.
10
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
11
King's College London, London, U.K.
12
Philadelphia, PA.
13
University of Washington, Seattle, WA. Electronic address: davidec@u.washington.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Despite growing evidence that bariatric/metabolic surgery powerfully improves type 2 diabetes (T2D), existing diabetes treatment algorithms do not include surgical options.

AIM:

The 2nd Diabetes Surgery Summit (DSS-II), an international consensus conference, was convened in collaboration with leading diabetes organizations to develop global guidelines to inform clinicians and policymakers about benefits and limitations of metabolic surgery for T2D.

METHODS:

A multidisciplinary group of 48 international clinicians/scholars (75% nonsurgeons), including representatives of leading diabetes organizations, participated in DSS-II. After evidence appraisal (MEDLINE [1 January 2005-30 September 2015]), three rounds of Delphi-like questionnaires were used to measure consensus for 32 data-based conclusions. These drafts were presented at the combined DSS-II and 3rd World Congress on Interventional Therapies for Type 2 Diabetes (London, U.K., 28-30 September 2015), where they were open to public comment by other professionals and amended face-to-face by the Expert Committee.

RESULTS:

Given its role in metabolic regulation, the gastrointestinal tract constitutes a meaningful target to manage T2D. Numerous randomized clinical trials, albeit mostly short/midterm, demonstrate that metabolic surgery achieves excellent glycemic control and reduces cardiovascular risk factors. On the basis of such evidence, metabolic surgery should be recommended to treat T2D in patients with class III obesity (BMI≥40 kg/m(2)) and in those with class II obesity (BMI 35.0-39.9 kg/m(2)) when hyperglycemia is inadequately controlled by lifestyle and optimal medical therapy. Surgery should also be considered for patients with T2D and BMI 30.0-34.9 kg/m(2) if hyperglycemia is inadequately controlled despite optimal treatment with either oral or injectable medications. These BMI thresholds should be reduced by 2.5 kg/m(2) for Asian patients.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although additional studies are needed to further demonstrate long-term benefits, there is sufficient clinical and mechanistic evidence to support inclusion of metabolic surgery among antidiabetes interventions for people with T2D and obesity. To date, the DSS-II guidelines have been formally endorsed by 45 worldwide medical and scientific societies. Health care regulators should introduce appropriate reimbursement policies.

PMID:
27568469
DOI:
10.1016/j.soard.2016.05.018
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center