Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Primates. 2017 Jan;58(1):121-129. doi: 10.1007/s10329-016-0562-y. Epub 2016 Aug 12.

Scales drive detection, attention, and memory of snakes in wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus).

Author information

1
Department of Anthropology, University of California, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA, 95616, USA. laisbell@ucdavis.edu.
2
Animal Behavior Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, USA. laisbell@ucdavis.edu.
3
Mpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, Kenya. laisbell@ucdavis.edu.
4
Kenya Wildlife Service, Nairobi, Kenya. laisbell@ucdavis.edu.
5
Department of Anthropology, University of California, One Shields Ave., Davis, CA, 95616, USA.

Abstract

Predatory snakes are argued to have been largely responsible for the origin of primates via selection favoring expansion of the primate visual system, and even today snakes can be deadly to primates. Neurobiological research is now beginning to reveal the mechanisms underlying the ability of primates (including humans) to detect snakes more rapidly than other stimuli. However, the visual cues allowing rapid detection of snakes, and the cognitive and ecological conditions contributing to faster detection, are unclear. Since snakes are often partially obscured by vegetation, the more salient cues are predicted to occur in small units. Here we tested for the salience of snake scales as the smallest of potential visual cues by presenting four groups of wild vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pytherythrus) with a gopher snake (Pituophis catenifer) skin occluded except for no more than 2.7 cm, in natural form and flat, the latter to control for even small curvilinear cues from their unusual body shape. Each of these treatments was preceded by a treatment without the snakeskin, the first to provide a baseline, and the second, to test for vigilance and memory recall after exposure to the snakeskin. We found that (1) vervets needed only a small portion of snakeskin for detection, (2) snake scales alone were sufficient for detection, (3) latency to detect the snakeskin was longer with more extensive and complex ground cover, and (4) vervets that were exposed to the snakeskin remembered where they last saw "snakes", as indicated by increased wariness near the occluding landmarks in the absence of the snakeskin and more rapid detection of the next presented snakeskin. Unexpectedly, adult males did not detect the snakeskin as well as adult females and juveniles. These findings extend our knowledge of the complex ecological and evolutionary relationships between snakes and primates.

KEYWORDS:

Age/sex differences; Memory; Primates; Rapid detection; Snake detection theory; Vigilance; Visual attention; Visual cues

PMID:
27517268
DOI:
10.1007/s10329-016-0562-y
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Springer
Loading ...
Support Center