Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Int Med Res. 2016 Dec;44(6):1222-1233. doi: 10.1177/0300060516642306. Epub 2016 Aug 6.

Dilatation of the initially non-aneurysmal ascending aorta after replacement of a bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic valve.

Author information

1
1 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Fu Wai Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
2
2 Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.

Abstract

Objective To compare the aortic diameter after isolated aortic valve replacement (AVR) in patients with a bicuspid (BAV) or tricuspid aortic valve (TAV) and an initially normal ascending aorta. Methods Patients with an ascending aortic diameter of < 45 mm who had undergone isolated AVR were studied. Ultrasonic cardiographic measurements of the ascending aortic diameter made pre- and postoperatively and follow-up data concerning adverse aortic events and death were analyzed. Results A total of 613 patients were included in this retrospective study; of these, 211 had a BAV and 402 had a TAV. In both groups, the ascending aorta significantly expanded but was non-aneurysmal during follow-up; however, the difference between the two groups was not significant. Cox regression analysis showed no significant effect associated with the presence of a BAV on adverse aortic events or death. Conclusion Dilatation of the ascending aorta was observed after AVR in both groups, but was not more pronounced in patients with a BAV. Long-term follow-up for ascending aortic aneurysm is necessary after AVR in both patients with a BAV and those with a TAV.

KEYWORDS:

Aortic root; aortic valve; congenital heart disease; heart valve prosthesis; valve replacement

PMID:
27484890
PMCID:
PMC5536755
DOI:
10.1177/0300060516642306
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center