Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Occup Environ Med. 2016 Nov;73(11):727-734. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2016-103634. Epub 2016 Jul 27.

Biomechanical and psychosocial exposures are independent risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome: assessment of confounding using causal diagrams.

Author information

1
Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
2
Department of Environmental Health Sciences, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.
3
Center for Ergonomics, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.
4
Rocky Mountain Center for Occupational and Environmental Health (RMCOEH), University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
5
Division of General Medical Science, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.
6
Washington State Department of Labor and Industries, Safety and Health Assessment and Research for Prevention (SHARP) Program, Olympia, Washington, USA.
7
Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, University of Iowa, College of Public Health, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
8
formerly with National Institute of Occupational Safety & Health, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
9
Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, California, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Between 2001 and 2010, six research groups conducted coordinated prospective studies of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) incidence among US workers from various industries to estimate exposure-response relationships.

OBJECTIVE:

This analysis examined the presence and magnitude of confounding between biomechanical and workplace psychosocial factors and incidence of dominant-hand CTS.

METHODS:

1605 participants, without CTS at enrolment, were followed for up to 3.5 years (2471 person-years). Demographic information, medical history and workplace psychosocial stress measures were collected at baseline. Individual workplace biomechanical exposures were collected for each task and combined across the workweek using time-weighted averaging (TWA). CTS case criteria were based on symptoms and results of electrophysiological testing. HRs were estimated with Cox proportional hazard models. Confounding was assessed using causal diagrams and an empirical criterion of 10% or greater change in effect estimate magnitude.

RESULTS:

There were 109 incident CTS cases (IR=4.41/100 person-years; 6.7% cumulative incidence). The relationships between CTS and forceful repetition rate, % time forceful hand exertion and the Threshold Limit Value for Hand Activity Level (TLV-HAL) were slightly confounded by decision latitude with effect estimates being attenuated towards the null (10-14% change) after adjustment. The risk of CTS among participants reporting high job strain was attenuated towards the null by 14% after adjusting for the HAL Scale or the % time forceful hand exertions.

CONCLUSIONS:

Although attenuation of the relationships between CTS and some biomechanical and work psychosocial exposures was observed after adjusting for confounding, the magnitudes were small and confirmed biomechanical and work psychosocial exposures as independent risk factors for incident CTS.

KEYWORDS:

biomechanical exposure; carpal tunnel syndrome; confounding; prospective; psychosocial exposure

PMID:
27466616
PMCID:
PMC6555409
DOI:
10.1136/oemed-2016-103634
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center