Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Nutr. 2016 Sep;146(9):1660-9. doi: 10.3945/jn.116.231803. Epub 2016 Jul 27.

Protein Supplementation Has Minimal Effects on Muscle Adaptations during Resistance Exercise Training in Young Men: A Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial.

Author information

1
Division of Rehabilitation Sciences; Departments of Nutrition and Metabolism.
2
Sealy Center on Aging; and.
3
School of Medicine, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX; and.
4
Departments of Nutrition and Metabolism.
5
DuPont Nutrition & Health, St. Louis, MO.
6
Preventive Medicine and Community Health, and.
7
Internal Medicine/Geriatrics; Sealy Center on Aging; and.
8
Division of Rehabilitation Sciences; Departments of Nutrition and Metabolism, Sealy Center on Aging; and blrasmus@utmb.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

To our knowledge the efficacy of soy-dairy protein blend (PB) supplementation with resistance exercise training (RET) has not been evaluated in a longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVE:

Our aim was to determine the effect of PB supplementation during RET on muscle adaptation.

METHODS:

In this double-blind randomized clinical trial, healthy young men [18-30 y; BMI (in kg/m(2)): 25 ± 0.5] participated in supervised whole-body RET at 60-80% 1-repetition maximum (1-RM) for 3 d/wk for 12 wk with random assignment to daily receive 22 g PB (n = 23), whey protein (WP) isolate (n = 22), or an isocaloric maltodextrin (carbohydrate) placebo [(MDP) n = 23]. Serum testosterone, muscle strength, thigh muscle thickness (MT), myofiber cross-sectional area (mCSA), and lean body mass (LBM) were assessed before and after 6 and 12 wk of RET.

RESULTS:

All treatments increased LBM (P < 0.001). ANCOVA did not identify an overall treatment effect at 12 wk (P = 0.11). There tended to be a greater change in LBM from baseline to 12 wk in the PB group than in the MDP group (0.92 kg; 95% CI: -0.12, 1.95 kg; P = 0.09); however, changes in the WP and MDP groups did not differ. Pooling data from combined PB and WP treatments showed a trend for greater change in LBM from baseline to 12 wk compared with MDP treatment (0.69 kg; 95% CI: -0.08, 1.46 kg; P = 0.08). Muscle strength, mCSA, and MT increased (P < 0.05) similarly for all treatments and were not different (P > 0.10) between treatments. Testosterone was not altered.

CONCLUSIONS:

PB supplementation during 3 mo of RET tended to slightly enhance gains in whole-body and arm LBM, but not leg muscle mass, compared with RET without protein supplementation. Although protein supplementation minimally enhanced gains in LBM of healthy young men, there was no enhancement of gains in strength. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT01749189.

KEYWORDS:

animal proteins; function; milk proteins; muscle mass; plant protein; strength training; weight training

PMID:
27466602
PMCID:
PMC4997282
DOI:
10.3945/jn.116.231803
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Conflict of interest statement

2 Author disclosures: PT Reidy, MS Borack, MM Markofski, JM Dickinson, RR Deer, SH Husaini, DK Walker, S Igbinigie, SM Robertson, MB Cope, R Mukherjea, JM Hall-Porter, K Jennings, E Volpi, and BB Rasmussen, no conflicts of interest. MB Cope and R Mukherjea were not involved with the research or laboratory analysis. Representatives from DuPont Nutrition & Health were not involved with data collection or laboratory analysis; however, JM Hall-Porter from DuPont Nutrition & Health was involved with the statistical analysis.

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for HighWire Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center