Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Influenza Other Respir Viruses. 2017 Jan;11(1):2-14. doi: 10.1111/irv.12411. Epub 2016 Aug 9.

CONSISE statement on the reporting of Seroepidemiologic Studies for influenza (ROSES-I statement): an extension of the STROBE statement.

Author information

1
Nuffield Department of Medicine, Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
2
WHO Collaborating Centre for Reference and Research on Influenza, at the Peter Doherty Institute for Infectious Diseases, Melbourne, Australia.
3
WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.
4
National Institute for Biological Standards and Control, Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, Potters Bar, UK.
5
Influenza Division, National Center for Immunization and Respiratory Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
6
Armed Forces Health Surveillance Center (AFHSC) and Cherokee Nation Technology Solutions, Inc, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
7
Center for Global Health, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Population-based serologic studies are a vital tool for understanding the epidemiology of influenza and other respiratory viruses, including the early assessment of the transmissibility and severity of the 2009 influenza pandemic, and Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. However, interpretation of the results of serologic studies has been hampered by the diversity of approaches and the lack of standardized methods and reporting.

OBJECTIVE:

The objective of the CONSISE ROSES-I statement was to improve the quality and transparency of reporting of influenza seroepidemiologic studies and facilitate the assessment of the validity and generalizability of published results.

METHODS:

The ROSES-I statement was developed as an expert consensus of the CONSISE epidemiology and laboratory working groups. The recommendations are presented in the familiar format of a reporting guideline. Because seroepidemiologic studies are a specific type of observational epidemiology study, the ROSES-I statement is built upon the STROBE guidelines. As such, the ROSES-I statement should be seen as an extension of the STROBE guidelines.

RESULTS:

The ROSES-I statement presents 42 items that can be used as a checklist of the information that should be included in the results of published seroepidemiologic studies, and which can also serve as a guide to the items that need to be considered during study design and implementation.

CONCLUSIONS:

We hope that the ROSES-I statement will contribute to improving the quality of reporting of seroepidemiologic studies.

PMID:
27417916
PMCID:
PMC5155648
DOI:
10.1111/irv.12411
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center