Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Scand J Urol. 2016 Oct;50(5):325-9. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2016.1201858. Epub 2016 Jul 14.

From Gleason to International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grading of prostate cancer.

Author information

1
a Aquesta Pathology , Brisbane , Queensland , Australia ;
2
b University of Queensland School of Medicine , Brisbane , Queensland , Australia ;
3
c Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine , Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Otago , Wellington , New Zealand ;
4
d Department of Urology , Royal Brisbane Hospital , Brisbane , Queensland , Australia ;
5
e Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine , McMaster University , Hamilton , Ontario , Canada ;
6
f Department of Oncology and Pathology , Karolinska Institutet , Stockholm , Sweden ;
7
g Department of Pathology , Karolinska University Hospital , Stockholm , Sweden.

Abstract

Gleason grading of prostate cancer has gained worldwide acceptance since its introduction 50 years ago. This system has fulfilled the role of a powerful prognostic indicator for many years and this has influenced treatment. There have been numerous changes to the management and diagnosis of prostate cancer since 1966, including prostate-specific antigen screening, resulting in the early detection of prostate cancer, This has resulted in the evolution of Gleason grading with the informal adoption of a number of alterations. Significant changes to Gleason grading were made in 2005 through a consensus conference convened by the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP). In more recent times, the necessity for further changes to prostate cancer grading has been apparent and a follow-up ISUP consensus conference was held in 2014. Changes resulting from this conference included the classifying of all cribriform cancer and glomeruloid patterns as Gleason grade 4, the grading of mucinous adenocarcinoma based on underlying architecture rather than uniformly considering these tumors as pattern 4, and the introduction of a Gleason score (GS)-based 5 grade system, which incorporated the 2014 modifications to the Gleason grading system. Designated ISUP grade, this system consists of five grades: grade 1 (GS ≤3 + 3), grade 2 (GS 3 + 4), grade 3 (GS 4 + 3), grade 4 (GS 4 + 4, 3 + 5, 5 + 3) and grade 5 (GS 9-10). With further advances recently reported in the literature, it is apparent that amendments to the current system are likely to be necessary in the future.

KEYWORDS:

Gleason; International Society of Urological Pathology; grade; prognosis; prostatic adenocarcinoma

PMID:
27415753
DOI:
10.1080/21681805.2016.1201858
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Taylor & Francis
Loading ...
Support Center