Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Cytometry A. 2017 Jan;91(1):85-95. doi: 10.1002/cyto.a.22906. Epub 2016 Jul 12.

Wild immunology assessed by multidimensional mass cytometry.

Author information

1
Regenerative Immunology and Aging, BCRT, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
2
BCRT Flow Cytometry Lab (BCRT-FCL), BCRT, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
3
Institute for Medical Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
4
Medical Department I (Gastroenterology, Rheumatology, Infectious Diseases), Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
5
Institute for Immunity, Transplantation, and Infection, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
6
Federal Office of Consumer Protection and Food Safety (BVL), Berlin, Germany.
7
Transplantation Tolerance, Institute for Medical Immunology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
8
Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum, Berlin, Germany.

Abstract

A great part of our knowledge on mammalian immunology has been established in laboratory settings. The use of inbred mouse strains enabled controlled studies of immune cell and molecule functions in defined settings. These studies were usually performed in specific-pathogen free (SPF) environments providing standardized conditions. In contrast, mammalians including humans living in their natural habitat are continuously facing pathogen encounters throughout their life. The influences of environmental conditions on the signatures of the immune system and on experimental outcomes are yet not well defined. Thus, the transferability of results obtained in current experimental systems to the physiological human situation has always been a matter of debate. Studies elucidating the diversity of "wild immunology" imprintings in detail and comparing it with those of "clean" lab mice are sparse. Here, we applied multidimensional mass cytometry to dissect phenotypic and functional differences between distinct groups of laboratory and pet shop mice as a source for "wild mice". For this purpose, we developed a 31-antibody panel for murine leukocyte subsets identification and a 35-antibody panel assessing various cytokines. Established murine leukocyte populations were easily identified and diverse immune signatures indicative of numerous pathogen encounters were classified particularly in pet shop mice and to a lesser extent in quarantine and non-SPF mice as compared to SPF mice. In addition, unsupervised analysis identified distinct clusters that associated strongly with the degree of pathogenic priming, including increased frequencies of activated NK cells and antigen-experienced B- and T-cell subsets. Our study unravels the complexity of immune signatures altered under physiological pathogen challenges and highlights the importance of carefully adapting laboratory settings for immunological studies in mice, including drug and therapy testing.

KEYWORDS:

Key terms: wild immunology; adaptive immune system; innate immune system; mass cytometry

PMID:
27403624
DOI:
10.1002/cyto.a.22906
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley
Loading ...
Support Center