Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2016 Nov;23(16):1715-1733. Epub 2016 Jun 27.

A review of guidelines for cardiac rehabilitation exercise programmes: Is there an international consensus?

Author information

1
Discipline of Exercise Sciences, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia kym.price@rmit.edu.au.
2
Discipline of Exercise Sciences, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Discipline of Exercise Physiology, La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
3
Discipline of Exercise Sciences, School of Health and Biomedical Sciences, RMIT University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Cardiac rehabilitation is an important component in the continuum of care for individuals with cardiovascular disease, providing a multidisciplinary education and exercise programme to improve morbidity and mortality risk. Internationally, cardiac rehabilitation programmes are implemented through various models. This review compared cardiac rehabilitation guidelines in order to identify any differences and/or consensus in exercise testing, prescription and monitoring.

METHODS:

Guidelines, position statements and policy documents for cardiac rehabilitation, available internationally in the English language, were identified through a search of electronic databases and government and cardiology society websites. Information about programme delivery, exercise testing, prescription and monitoring were extracted and compared.

RESULTS:

Leading cardiac rehabilitation societies in North America and Europe recommend that patients progress from moderate- to vigorous-intensity aerobic endurance exercise over the course of the programme, with resistance training included as an important adjunct, for maintaining independence and quality of life. North American and European guidelines also recommend electrocardiograph-monitored exercise stress tests. Guidelines for South America and individual European nations typically include similar recommendations; however, those in the United Kingdom, Australia and New Zealand specify lower-intensity exercise and less technical assessment of functional capacity.

CONCLUSION:

Higher-intensity aerobic training programmes, supplemented by resistance training, have been recommended and deemed safe for cardiac rehabilitation patients by many authorities. Based on research evidence, this may also provide superior outcomes for patients and should therefore be considered when developing an international consensus for exercise prescription in cardiac rehabilitation.

KEYWORDS:

Cardiac rehabilitation; cardiovascular disease; exercise; exercise test; exercise therapy; guidelines

PMID:
27353128
DOI:
10.1177/2047487316657669
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Atypon
Loading ...
Support Center