Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Am J Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep;169:125-137. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.025. Epub 2016 Jun 23.

Development of Definitive and Reliable Grading Scales for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction.

Author information

1
Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Ophthalmology, Itoh Clinic, Saitama, Japan. Electronic address: ritoh@za2.so-net.ne.jp.
2
Research and Development Division, Santen Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Osaka, Japan.
3
Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan.
4
Department of Ophthalmology, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
5
Tokyo Kyosai Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To develop and validate grading scales for meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) that allow consistent diagnosis of MGD and are suitable for clinical studies.

DESIGN:

Development and validation study of grading scales.

METHODS:

Lid margin and meibomian gland photographs were taken in the multicenter, prospective cross-sectional study for MGD and control subjects. New grading scales for MGD signs (abnormal lid margin findings of vascularity, plugging of gland orifices, lid margin irregularity, lid margin thickening, partial glands, and gland dropout) in both upper and lower eyelids were developed. Three MGD experts, 3 general ophthalmologists, and 3 non-physicians independently tested the scales by evaluating photographs. The levels of interrater and intrarater agreement for each grading scale were estimated with the use of kappa statistics.

RESULTS:

Thirty-eight patients with MGD and 20 control subjects were enrolled and photographed. New grading scales were developed using a total of 226 photographs. The interrater kappa values for MGD experts and for general ophthalmologists and non-physicians with reference to an MGD expert ranged from 0.36 to 0.87 (median of 0.66), 0.41 to 0.73 (0.60), and 0.30 to 0.77 (0.59), respectively. Those for intrarater reliability for 2 MGD experts ranged from 0.49 to 0.93 (0.82).

CONCLUSIONS:

New grading scales for MGD signs were developed and found to have appropriate inter- and intrarater reliabilities for grading MGD. These grading scales are suitable for MGD diagnosis and application to multicenter trials.

PMID:
27345733
DOI:
10.1016/j.ajo.2016.06.025
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free full text

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center