Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Equity Health. 2016 Jun 22;15:97. doi: 10.1186/s12939-016-0384-y.

How to improve collaboration between the public health sector and other policy sectors to reduce health inequalities? - A study in sixteen municipalities in the Netherlands.

Author information

1
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Health and Society, PO Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. ilse.storm@rivm.nl.
2
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Health and Society, PO Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
3
Tilburg University, Tranzo Scientific Center for Care and Welfare, PO 90153, 5000 LE, Tilburg, The Netherlands.
4
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Executive Office, PO Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
5
Department of Health Sciences and EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
6
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Centre for Nutrition, Prevention and Health Services, PO Box 1, 3720 BA, Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

The causes of health inequalities are complex. For the reduction of health inequalities, intersectoral collaboration between the public health sector and both social policy sectors (e.g. youth affairs, education) and physical policy sectors (e.g. housing, spatial planning) is essential, but in local practice difficult to realize. The aim of this study was to examine the collaboration between the sectors in question more closely and to identify opportunities for improvement.

METHOD:

A qualitative descriptive analysis of five aspects of collaboration within sixteen Dutch municipalities was performed to examine the collaboration between the public health sector and other policy sectors: 1) involvement of the sectors in the public health policy network, 2) harmonisation of objectives, 3) use of policies by the relevant sectors, 4) formalised collaboration, and 5) previous experience. Empirical data on these collaboration aspects were collected based on document analysis, questionnaires and interviews.

RESULTS:

The study found that the policy workers of social sectors were more involved in the public health network and more frequently supported the objectives in the field of health inequality reduction. Both social policy sectors and physical policy sectors used policies and activities to reduce health inequalities. More is done to influence the determinants of health inequality through policies aimed at lifestyle and social setting than through policies aimed at socioeconomic factors and the physical environment. Where the physical policy sectors are involved in the public health network, the collaboration follows a very similar pattern as with the social policy sectors. All sectors recognise the importance of good relationships, positive experiences, a common interest in working together and coordinated mechanisms.

CONCLUSION:

This study shows that there is scope for improving collaboration in the field of health inequality reduction between the public health sector and both social policy sectors and physical policy sectors. Ways in which improvement could be realised include involving physical policy sectors in the network, pursuing widely supported policy goals, making balanced efforts to influence determinants of health inequalities, and increasing the emphasis on a programmatic approach.

KEYWORDS:

Health in All Policies (HiAP); Health inequalities; Intersectoral collaboration; Physical sectors; Public health; Social sectors

PMID:
27334297
PMCID:
PMC4918104
DOI:
10.1186/s12939-016-0384-y
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center