Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Jun 13;14(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0112-5.

Applying for, reviewing and funding public health research in Germany and beyond.

Author information

1
Department for Health Services Research, Institute for Public Health and Nursing Research, Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
2
Institute of Medical Biometry and Epidemiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
3
Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
4
Departments of Sociology and Human Geography, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
5
Department of Medical Information Sciences, Biometrics, and Epidemiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
6
Integrative Rehabilitation Research Unit, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Health Systems Research, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
7
Institute for Medical Sociology, Health Services Research and Rehabilitation Science, Center for Health Services Research Cologne, Faculty of Human Science and Faculty of Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
8
Epidemiology, Biostatistics & Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
9
Department of Epidemiology and International Public Health, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
10
Institute for Public Health, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany.
11
CELLS - Centre for Ethics and Law in the Life Sciences, Institute for History, Ethics and Philosophy in Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
12
German Medical Faculties' Association (MFT), Berlin, Germany.
13
Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Health Sciences Bremen, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
14
Department of General Practice, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany. eva.hummers-pradier@med.uni-goettingen.de.

Abstract

Public health research is complex, involves various disciplines, epistemological perspectives and methods, and is rarely conducted in a controlled setting. Often, the added value of a research project lies in its inter- or trans-disciplinary interaction, reflecting the complexity of the research questions at hand. This creates specific challenges when writing and reviewing public health research grant applications. Therefore, the German Research Foundation (DFG), the largest independent research funding organization in Germany, organized a round table to discuss the process of writing, reviewing and funding public health research. The aim was to analyse the challenges of writing, reviewing and granting scientific public health projects and to improve the situation by offering guidance to applicants, reviewers and funding organizations. The DFG round table discussion brought together national and international public health researchers and representatives of funding organizations. Based on their presentations and discussions, a core group of the participants (the authors) wrote a first draft on the challenges of writing and reviewing public health research proposals and on possible solutions. Comments were discussed in the group of authors until consensus was reached. Public health research demands an epistemological openness and the integration of a broad range of specific skills and expertise. Applicants need to explicitly refer to theories as well as to methodological and ethical standards and elaborate on why certain combinations of theories and methods are required. Simultaneously, they must acknowledge and meet the practical and ethical challenges of conducting research in complex real life settings. Reviewers need to make the rationale for their judgments transparent, refer to the corresponding standards and be explicit about any limitations in their expertise towards the review boards. Grant review boards, funding organizations and research ethics committees need to be aware of the specific conditions of public health research, provide adequate guidance to applicants and reviewers, and ensure that processes and the expertise involved adequately reflect the topic under review.

KEYWORDS:

Funding; Grants peer review; Health services research; Health systems research; Public health; Research

PMID:
27297230
PMCID:
PMC4907007
DOI:
10.1186/s12961-016-0112-5
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for BioMed Central Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center