Format

Send to

Choose Destination
PLoS One. 2016 Jun 8;11(6):e0156891. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0156891. eCollection 2016.

Comparative Effectiveness of Phosphate Binders in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.

Author information

1
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
2
Department of Pediatrics and Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
3
Centre for Evaluation of Medicine, St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
4
Biostatistics Unit, Father Sean O'Sullivan Research Centre, St Joseph's Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
5
Population Health Research Institute, Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
6
Humber River Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
7
Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
8
DeGroote School of Business, 4350 South Service Road, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
9
The Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
10
Department of Anesthesia, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
11
Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
12
Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
13
Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD) has been linked to poor health outcomes, including diminished quality and length of life. This condition is characterized by high phosphate levels and requires phosphate-lowering agents-phosphate binders. The objective of this systematic review is to compare the effects of available phosphate binders on patient-important outcomes in patients with CKD-MBD.

METHODS:

Data sources included MEDLINE and EMBASE Trials from 1996 to February 2016. We also searched the Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials up to April 2016. Teams of two reviewers, independently and in duplicate, screened titles and abstracts and potentially eligible full text reports to determine eligibility, and subsequently abstracted data and assessed risk of bias in eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Eligible trials enrolled patients with CKD-MBD, randomized them to receive calcium (delivered as calcium acetate, calcium citrate or calcium carbonate), non-calcium-based phosphate binders (NCBPB) (sevelamer hydrochloride, sevelamer carbonate, lanthanum carbonate, sucroferric oxyhydroxide and ferric citrate), phosphorus restricted diet, placebo or no treatment, and reported effects on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality or hospitalization at ≥4 weeks follow-up. We performed network meta-analyses (NMA) for all cause-mortality for individual agents (seven-node analysis) and conventional meta-analysis of calcium vs. NCBPBs for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and hospitalization. In the NMAs, we calculated the effect estimates for direct, indirect and network meta-analysis estimates; for both NMA and conventional meta-analysis, we pooled treatment effects as risk ratios (RR) and calculated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) using random effect models. We used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to rate the quality of evidence for each paired comparison.

RESULTS:

Our search yielded 1190 citations, of which 71 RCTs were retrieved for full review and 15 proved eligible. With 13 eligible studies from a prior review, we included 28 studies with 8335 participants; 25 trials provided data for our quantitative synthesis. Results suggest higher mortality with calcium than either sevelamer (NMA RR, 1.89 [95% CI, 1.02 to 3.50], moderate quality evidence) or NCBPBs (conventional meta-analysis RR, 1.76 [95% CI, 1.21 to 2.56, moderate quality evidence). Conventional meta-analysis suggested no difference in cardiovascular mortality between calcium and NCBPBs (RR, 2.54 [95% CI, 0.67 to 9.62 low quality evidence). Our results suggest higher hospitalization, although non-significant, with calcium than NCBPBs (RR, 1.293 [95% CI, 0.94 to 1.74, moderate quality evidence).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS:

Use of calcium results in higher mortality than either sevelamer in particular and NCBPBs in general (moderate quality evidence). Our results raise questions about whether administration of calcium as an intervention for CKD- MBD remains ethical. Further research is needed to explore the effects of different types of phosphate binders, including novel agents such as iron, on quality and quantity of life.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION:

PROSPERO CRD-42016032945.

PMID:
27276077
PMCID:
PMC4898688
DOI:
10.1371/journal.pone.0156891
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Public Library of Science Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center