Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Dairy Sci. 2016 Aug;99(8):6446-6456. doi: 10.3168/jds.2015-10293. Epub 2016 Jun 2.

Evaluation of milk cathelicidin for detection of dairy sheep mastitis.

Author information

1
Porto Conte Ricerche, SP 55 Porto Conte/Capo Caccia, Loc. Tramariglio, 07041 Alghero, Italy. Electronic address: addis@portocontericerche.it.
2
Porto Conte Ricerche, SP 55 Porto Conte/Capo Caccia, Loc. Tramariglio, 07041 Alghero, Italy.
3
C.Re.N.M.O.C. (Centro di Referenza Nazionale per le Mastopatie degli Ovini e dei Caprini), Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale della Sardegna, Via Duca degli Abruzzi 8, 07100 Sassari, Italy.
4
Porto Conte Ricerche, SP 55 Porto Conte/Capo Caccia, Loc. Tramariglio, 07041 Alghero, Italy; Università degli Studi di Sassari, Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche, Viale S. Pietro 43/B, 07100 Sassari, Italy. Electronic address: uzzau@uniss.it.

Abstract

Mastitis due to intramammary infections is one of the most detrimental diseases in dairy sheep farming, representing a major cause of reduced milk productions and quality losses. In particular, subclinical mastitis presents significant detection and control problems, and the availability of tools enabling its timely, sensitive, and specific detection is therefore crucial. We have previously demonstrated that cathelicidins, small proteins implicated in the innate immune defense of the host, are specifically released in milk of mastitic animals by both epithelial cells and neutrophils. Here, we describe the development of an ELISA for milk cathelicidin and assess its value against somatic cell counts (SCC) and bacteriological culture for detection of ewe mastitis. Evaluation of the cathelicidin ELISA was carried out on 705 half-udder milk samples from 3 sheep flocks enrolled in a project for improvement of mammary health. Cathelicidin was detected in 35.3% of milk samples (249/705), and its amount increased with rising SCC values. The cathelicidin-negative (n=456) and cathelicidin-positive (n=249) sample groups showed a clear separation in relation to SCC, with median values of 149,500 and 3,300,000 cells/mL, respectively. Upon bacteriological culture, 20.6% (145/705) of the milk samples showed microbial growth, with coagulase-negative staphylococci being by far the most frequent finding. A significant proportion of all bacteriologically positive milk samples were positive for cathelicidin (110/145, 75.9%). Given the lack of a reliable gold standard for defining the true disease status, sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Sp) of the cathelicidin ELISA were assessed by latent class analysis against 2 SCC thresholds and against bacteriological culture results. At an SCC threshold of 500,000 cells/mL, Se and Sp were 92.3 and 92.3% for cathelicidin ELISA, 89.0 and 94.9% for SCC, and 39.4 and 93.6% for bacteriological culture, respectively. At an SCC threshold of 1,000,000 cells/mL, Se and Sp were 93.3 and 91.9% for cathelicidin ELISA, 80.0 and 97.1% for SCC, and 39.4 and 93.5% for bacteriology, respectively. In view of the results obtained in this study, the measurement of cathelicidin in milk by ELISA can provide added Se while maintaining a high Sp and may therefore improve detection of subclinical mastitis.

KEYWORDS:

ELISA; ewe; small ruminant; subclinical mastitis

PMID:
27265177
DOI:
10.3168/jds.2015-10293
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center