Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2017 Apr;29(2):65-71. doi: 10.1017/neu.2016.21. Epub 2016 May 5.

A critical review of exercise as a treatment for clinically depressed adults: time to get pragmatic.

Author information

1
1Post-Graduation Program of Medical Sciences: Psychiatry,Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul,Porto Alegre,Brazil.
2
2Exercise Psychology and Quality of Life Laboratory,Department of Physical Education and Sport Science,University of Thessaly,Trikala,Greece.
3
3Department of Kinesiology,Iowa States University,Ames,IA,USA.
4
4School of Psychiatry,University of New South Wales,Sydney,Australia.
5
6Physiotherapy Department,South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust,Denmark Hill,London,UK.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE:

Although considerable evidence supports the efficacy of exercise as an antidepressant treatment, critical reviews informing routine practice and future research directions are scarce.

METHODS:

We critically reviewed exercise studies for clinically depressed adults, focussing on the PICOS criteria referred to participants, interventions, comparisons, outcomes, and study designs.

RESULTS:

Most studies have not screened their samples for symptom heterogeneity. Also, they have employed heterogeneous exercise interventions and control groups that may lead to an underestimation of the benefits of exercise. In addition, pragmatic trials allowing scalable replication and implementation in routine practice are scarce. Future studies, can consider the research domain criteria as a diagnostic framework, and conduct moderator analyses to identify depressed subgroups with symptomatology and biopsychosocial characteristics associated with differential responses to exercise interventions. The search for biomarkers of the antidepressant responses to exercise should be prioritised. Further, non-physically active comparison groups should be used to minimise treatment cross-overs and thus the underestimation of the effects of exercise interventions. Finally, the use of outcome measures that maintain their validity at low and moderate levels of symptom severity and the development of trials with a pragmatic design are essential.

CONCLUSION:

The current evidence base is fraught with methodological considerations that need to be taken into account in order to increase further our understanding on the impact of exercise as medicine in depression. Future research should include moderator analyses, incorporate biomarker assays, use appropriate control and comparison groups, assess outcomes with psychometrically sensitive measures, and prioritise pragmatic trials towards transition to routine practice.

KEYWORDS:

depression; exercise; physical activity; review; treatment

PMID:
27145824
DOI:
10.1017/neu.2016.21
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Cambridge University Press
Loading ...
Support Center