Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Pain. 2016 Aug;157(8):1599-606. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000492.

Neuropathic pain: an updated grading system for research and clinical practice.

Author information

1
aDanish Pain Research Center, Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark bDivision of Clinical and Translational Research, Department of Anesthesiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA cBrain Function Research Group, School of Physiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa dDivision of Neurological Pain Research and Therapy, Department of Neurology, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany eNuffield Department of Clinical Neuroscience, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom fINSERM U-987, Centre d'Evaluation et de Traitement de la Douleur, CHU Ambroise Paré, Boulogne-Billancourt, France gUniversité Versailles-Saint-Quentin, Versailles, France hDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy iAutonomic and Peripheral Nerve Laboratory, Department of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA jDepartment of Pain Management and Research, Division of Emergencies and Critical Care, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway kDepartment of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden lPain Research Institute, Neuroscience Research Centre, The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom mDivision of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA nPain Research, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, United Kingdom oPain Medicine, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom pNeuroscience Technologies, Ltd, Barcelona, Spain qNinewells Hospital and Medical School, Division of Population Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Dundee, Dundee, Scotland rChair of Neurophysiology, Center of Biomedicine and Medical Technology Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelbe

Abstract

The redefinition of neuropathic pain as "pain arising as a direct consequence of a lesion or disease affecting the somatosensory system," which was suggested by the International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) Special Interest Group on Neuropathic Pain (NeuPSIG) in 2008, has been widely accepted. In contrast, the proposed grading system of possible, probable, and definite neuropathic pain from 2008 has been used to a lesser extent. Here, we report a citation analysis of the original NeuPSIG grading paper of 2008, followed by an analysis of its use by an expert panel and recommendations for an improved grading system. As of February, 2015, 608 eligible articles in Scopus cited the paper, 414 of which cited the neuropathic pain definition. Of 220 clinical studies citing the paper, 56 had used the grading system. The percentage using the grading system increased from 5% in 2009 to 30% in 2014. Obstacles to a wider use of the grading system were identified, including (1) questions about the relative significance of confirmatory tests, (2) the role of screening tools, and (3) uncertainties about what is considered a neuroanatomically plausible pain distribution. Here, we present a revised grading system with an adjusted order, better reflecting clinical practice, improvements in the specifications, and a word of caution that even the "definite" level of neuropathic pain does not always indicate causality. In addition, we add a table illustrating the area of pain and sensory abnormalities in common neuropathic pain conditions and propose areas for further research.

PMID:
27115670
PMCID:
PMC4949003
DOI:
10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000492
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wolters Kluwer Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center