Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Viruses. 2016 Apr 22;8(4):118. doi: 10.3390/v8040118.

HIV-1 Mutation and Recombination Rates Are Different in Macrophages and T-cells.

Author information

1
Infection Analytics Program, Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia. d.cromer@unsw.edu.au.
2
Centre for Vascular Research, UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia. d.cromer@unsw.edu.au.
3
Sydney School of Public Health, Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney NSW 2006, Australia. tim.schlub@sydney.edu.au.
4
Centre for Virology, Burnet Institute, Melbourne VIC 3004, Australia. r.smyth@ibmc-cnrs.unistra.fr.
5
Architecture et Réactivité de l'ARN, IBMC, CNRS, Université de Strasbourg, 67084 Strasbourg, France. r.smyth@ibmc-cnrs.unistra.fr.
6
Infection Analytics Program, Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia. andrew.j.grimm@gmail.com.
7
Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases (IIID), Murdoch University, Perth WA 6150, Australia. a.chopra@iiid.com.au.
8
Institute for Immunology and Infectious Diseases (IIID), Murdoch University, Perth WA 6150, Australia. S.Mallal@iiid.com.au.
9
Infection Analytics Program, Kirby Institute, UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia. mdavenport@kirby.unsw.edu.au.
10
Centre for Vascular Research, UNSW Australia, Sydney NSW 2052, Australia. mdavenport@kirby.unsw.edu.au.
11
Biosecurity Flagship, CSIRO (AAHL), Geelong VIC 3220, Australia. johnson.mak@deakin.edu.au.
12
School of Medicine, Deakin University and CSIRO (AAHL), Geelong VIC 3216, Australia. johnson.mak@deakin.edu.au.

Abstract

High rates of mutation and recombination help human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) to evade the immune system and develop resistance to antiretroviral therapy. Macrophages and T-cells are the natural target cells of HIV-1 infection. A consensus has not been reached as to whether HIV replication results in differential recombination between primary T-cells and macrophages. Here, we used HIV with silent mutation markers along with next generation sequencing to compare the mutation and the recombination rates of HIV directly in T lymphocytes and macrophages. We observed a more than four-fold higher recombination rate of HIV in macrophages compared to T-cells (p < 0.001) and demonstrated that this difference is not due to different reliance on C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) and C-C chemokine receptor type 5 (CCR5) co-receptors between T-cells and macrophages. We also found that the pattern of recombination across the HIV genome (hot and cold spots) remains constant between T-cells and macrophages despite a three-fold increase in the overall recombination rate. This indicates that the difference in rates is a general feature of HIV DNA synthesis during macrophage infection. In contrast to HIV recombination, we found that T-cells have a 30% higher mutation rate than macrophages (p < 0.001) and that the mutational profile is similar between these cell types. Unexpectedly, we found no association between mutation and recombination in macrophages, in contrast to T-cells. Our data highlights some of the fundamental difference of HIV recombination and mutation amongst these two major target cells of infection. Understanding these differences will provide invaluable insights toward HIV evolution and how the virus evades immune surveillance and anti-retroviral therapeutics.

KEYWORDS:

HIV; evolution; mutation; recombination

PMID:
27110814
PMCID:
PMC4848610
DOI:
10.3390/v8040118
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI) Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center