What Can We Do to Optimize Colonoscopy and How Effective Can We Be?

Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2016 Jun;18(6):27. doi: 10.1007/s11894-016-0500-6.

Abstract

In the USA, colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer and third leading cause of cancer death among both men and women. Declining rates of colon cancer in the past decade have been attributed in part to screening and removal of precancerous polyps via colonoscopy. Recent emphasis has been placed on measures to increase the quality and effectiveness of colonoscopy. These have been divided into pre-procedure quality metrics (bowel preparation), procedural quality metrics (cecal intubation, withdrawal time, and adenoma detection rate), post-procedure metrics (surveillance interval), and other quality metrics (patient satisfaction and willingness to repeat the procedure). The purpose of this article is to review the data and controversies surrounding each of these and identify ways to optimize the performance of colonoscopy.

Keywords: Adenoma detection rate; Bowel prep; Colonoscopy.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adenoma / diagnosis*
  • Cathartics / administration & dosage
  • Cecum / pathology
  • Colonoscopy / methods*
  • Colonoscopy / standards*
  • Colonoscopy / trends
  • Colorectal Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Early Detection of Cancer / methods
  • Humans
  • Patient Satisfaction
  • Precancerous Conditions / diagnosis

Substances

  • Cathartics