Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Fam Pract. 2016 Jun;33(3):274-85. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw024. Epub 2016 Apr 13.

Electronic consultation systems: worldwide prevalence and their impact on patient care-a systematic review.

Author information

1
C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Department of Family Medicine and cliddy@bruyere.org.
2
C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario.
3
Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario and Division of Endocrinology/Metabolism, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Many health organizations are exploring the potential of electronic consultation (eConsult) services to address excessive wait times for specialist care.

OBJECTIVE:

To understand the effectiveness, population impact and costs associated with implementation of eConsult services.

METHODS:

We conducted a systematic review using a narrative synthesis approach. We searched Medline and Embase from inception to August 2014 (English/French). Included studies focused on communication between primary care providers and specialist physicians through an asynchronous, directed communication over a secure electronic medium. We assessed study quality with a modified version of the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. We synthesized the results using the Triple Aim framework.

RESULTS:

A total of 36 studies were included. Most were set in the USA and focused on single-specialty services (most commonly dermatology). Population health outcomes included patient populations, adoption/utilization and provider attitudes. Providers cited timely advice from specialists, good medical care, confirmation of diagnoses and educational benefits. No clinical outcomes were reported. Patient experience of care was generally positive, with quick specialist response times (4.6 hours to 3.9 days), avoided referrals (12-84%) and satisfaction ranging from 78% to 93%. System costs were reported in only seven studies using different outcome measures and settings, limiting comparability.

CONCLUSION:

Though eConsult systems are highly acceptable for patients and providers and deliver improved access to specialist advice, gaps remain regarding eConsult's impact on population health and system costs. To achieve optimized health system performance, eConsult services must include specialty services as determined by community needs and further explore cost-effectiveness.

KEYWORDS:

Access to care; eConsult; electronic consultation; primary care; referral; wait times.

PMID:
27075028
DOI:
10.1093/fampra/cmw024
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Silverchair Information Systems
Loading ...
Support Center