Format

Send to

Choose Destination
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Jul;25(7):1115-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Apr 8.

Patient factors influencing return to work and cumulative financial claims after clavicle fractures in workers' compensation cases.

Author information

1
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.
2
Department of Orthopaedics, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA. Electronic address: Ilya_Voloshin@urmc.rochester.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

This study analyzed workers' compensation patients after surgical or nonoperative treatment of clavicle fractures to identify factors that influence the time for return to work and total health care reimbursement claims. We hypothesized that return to work for operative patients would be faster.

METHODS:

The International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes and Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to retrospectively query the Workers' Compensation national database. The outcomes of interest were the number of days for return to full work after surgery and total reimbursement for health care-related claims. The primary independent variable was treatment modality.

RESULTS:

There were 169 claims for clavicle fractures within the database (surgical, n = 34; nonoperative, n = 135). The average health care claims reimbursed were $29,136 ± $26,998 for surgical management compared with $8366 ± $14,758 for nonoperative management (P < .001). We did not find a statistically significant difference between surgical (196 ± 287 days) and nonoperative (69 ± 94 days) treatment groups in their time to return to work (P = .06); however, there was high variability in both groups. Litigation was an independent predictor of prolonged return to work (P = .007) and higher health care costs (P = .003).

CONCLUSION:

Workers' compensation patients treated for clavicle fractures return to work at roughly the same time whether they are treated surgically or nonoperatively, with surgery being roughly 3 times more expensive. There was a substantial amount of variability in return to work timing by subjects in both groups. Litigation was a predictor of longer return to work timing and higher health care costs.

KEYWORDS:

Return to work; clavicle fracture; cost effectiveness; health care costs; health care reimbursement; workers' compensation

PMID:
27066964
DOI:
10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.004
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center