Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Int J Sports Med. 2016 Jun;37(6):442-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1569369. Epub 2016 Apr 4.

Effects of Varied Versus Constant Loading Zones on Muscular Adaptations in Trained Men.

Author information

1
Department of Health Sciences, CUNY Lehman College, Bronx, United States.
2
Sport Performance Research Institute, Aukland University of Technology, Aukland, New Zealand.
3
Health Sciences, McMaster University, W. Hamilton, Canada.
4
Neuromuscular and Neurometabolic Unit, Cal State Fullerton, Fullerton, United States.
5
Weightology.net, Issaquah, United States.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of a protocol employing a combination of loading zones vs. one employing a constant medium-repetition loading zone on muscular adaptations in resistance-trained men. 19 trained men (height=176.9±7.0 cm; body mass=83.1±11.8 kg; age=23.3±2.9 years) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 experimental groups: a constant-rep resistance training (RT) routine (CONSTANT) that trained using 8-12 RM per set, or a varied-rep RT routine (VARIED) that trained with 2-4 RM per set on Day 1, 8-12 RM per set on Day 2, and 20-30 RM on Day 3 for 8 weeks. Results showed that both groups significantly increased markers of muscle strength, muscle thickness, and local muscular endurance, with no differences noted between groups. Effect sizes favored VARIED over CONSTANT condition for elbow flexor thickness (0.72 vs. 0.57), elbow extensor thickness (0.77 vs. 0.48), maximal bench press strength (0.80 vs. 0.57), and upper body muscle endurance (1.91 vs. 1.28). In conclusion, findings indicate that both varied and constant loading approaches can promote significant improvements in muscular adaptations in trained young men.

PMID:
27042999
DOI:
10.1055/s-0035-1569369
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart, New York
Loading ...
Support Center