Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Arthroscopy. 2016 Aug;32(8):1612-21. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.033. Epub 2016 Mar 28.

Quality and Variability of Online Available Physical Therapy Protocols From Academic Orthopaedic Surgery Programs for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Author information

1
Department of Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.. Electronic address: ericmakhnimd@gmail.com.
2
Department of Orthopaedics, Naval Medical Center San Diego, San Diego, California, U.S.A.
3
Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, New York, U.S.A.
4
Department of Orthopaedics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.
5
Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, U.S.A.
6
Section of Sports Medicine, Sports Medicine Fellowship Program Director, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, U.S.A.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To assess the quality and variability found across anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rehabilitation protocols published online by academic orthopaedic programs.

METHODS:

Web-based ACL physical therapy protocols from United States academic orthopaedic programs available online were included for review. Main exclusion criteria included concomitant meniscus repair, protocols aimed at pediatric patients, and failure to provide time points for the commencement or recommended completion of any protocol components. A comprehensive, custom scoring rubric was created that was used to assess each protocol for the presence or absence of various rehabilitation components, as well as when those activities were allowed to be initiated in each protocol.

RESULTS:

Forty-two protocols were included for review from 155 U.S. academic orthopaedic programs. Only 13 protocols (31%) recommended a prehabilitation program. Five protocols (12%) recommended continuous passive motion postoperatively. Eleven protocols (26%) recommended routine partial or non-weight bearing immediately postoperatively. Ten protocols (24%) mentioned utilization of a secondary/functional brace. There was considerable variation in range of desired full-weight-bearing initiation (9 weeks), as well as in the types of strength and proprioception exercises specifically recommended. Only 8 different protocols (19%) recommended return to sport after achieving certain strength and activity criteria.

CONCLUSIONS:

Many ACL rehabilitation protocols recommend treatment modalities not supported by current reports. Moreover, high variability in the composition and time ranges of rehabilitation components may lead to confusion among patients and therapists.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:

Level II.

PMID:
27032604
DOI:
10.1016/j.arthro.2016.01.033
[Indexed for MEDLINE]

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Elsevier Science
Loading ...
Support Center