Format

Send to

Choose Destination
Biometrics. 2016 Dec;72(4):1315-1324. doi: 10.1111/biom.12501. Epub 2016 Mar 17.

Biased and unbiased estimation in longitudinal studies with informative visit processes.

Author information

1
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.
2
Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California, U.S.A.

Abstract

The availability of data in longitudinal studies is often driven by features of the characteristics being studied. For example, clinical databases are increasingly being used for research to address longitudinal questions. Because visit times in such data are often driven by patient characteristics that may be related to the outcome being studied, the danger is that this will result in biased estimation compared to designed, prospective studies. We study longitudinal data that follow a generalized linear mixed model and use a log link to relate an informative visit process to random effects in the mixed model. This device allows us to elucidate which parameters are biased under the informative visit process and to what degree. We show that the informative visit process can badly bias estimators of parameters of covariates associated with the random effects, while allowing consistent estimation of other parameters.

KEYWORDS:

Bias; Missing not at random; Mixed effects model; Multiplicative link

PMID:
26990830
PMCID:
PMC5026863
DOI:
10.1111/biom.12501
[Indexed for MEDLINE]
Free PMC Article

Supplemental Content

Full text links

Icon for Wiley Icon for PubMed Central
Loading ...
Support Center